2013
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2013114-4363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meat quality of veal: Discriminatory ability of weaning status

Abstract: The physicochemical and fatty acid compositions of meat from 81 calves were measured in order to prove whether the extension of suckling period could distinguish “Normal” from “Suprema” class calves. Three groups of animals were investigated depending on their weaning status: NW (animals were milk-fed until seven months), W1 and W2 (animals which were weaned at different ages and reared either in family farms or in feedlot, respectively). There was no difference among animals in relation to the main components… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cooking loss was calculated as described by Pateiro et al . Briefly, steaks were cooked in vacuum package bags placed in a water bath with automatic temperature control (JP Selecta, Precisdg, Barcelona, Spain) until they reached an internal temperature of 70 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cooking loss was calculated as described by Pateiro et al . Briefly, steaks were cooked in vacuum package bags placed in a water bath with automatic temperature control (JP Selecta, Precisdg, Barcelona, Spain) until they reached an internal temperature of 70 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cooking loss was calculated as described by Pateiro et al 34 Briefly, steaks were cooked in vacuum package bags placed in a water bath with automatic temperature control (JP Selecta, Precisdg, Barcelona, Spain) until they reached an internal temperature of 70 ∘ C. The temperature was controlled by type K thermocouples (Comark, PK23M, UK), connected to a data logger (Comark Dilligence EVG, N3014, UK). After cooking, samples were cooled in a circulatory water bath set at 18 ∘ C for 30 min and the percentage of cooking loss was calculated.…”
Section: Meat Quality Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PGI comprises the RG purebred and its crosses, and classifies the animals as calves (98%) and steers (2%), depending on whether the slaughter is earlier or later than 10 months, respectively (Pateiro et al . ). This breed shows a high growth rate and a low development of fat depots at slaughter age, thus a concentrate‐based diet is frequently used to produce the traditional non‐weaned calf (Monserrat & Sánchez ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…marbling or IMF content of meat is important because of its relationship with flavour, tenderness and juiciness. Apart from the chemical composition, other indicators of meat quality include ultimate pH, drip loss, water holding capacity (WHC), colour, cooking loss and tenderness …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were expressed as milligrams of cholesterol per 100 g of meat. The WHC was calculated as cooking loss and the Warner-Braztler test was performed following procedure described in Pateiro et al 7 Briefly, steaks were cooked placing vacuum package bags in a water bath with automatic temperature control (JP Selecta, Precisdg, Barcelona, Spain) until they reached an internal temperature of 70 ∘ C, controlled by thermocouples type K (Comark, PK23M, UK), connected to a data logger (Comark Dilligence EVG, N3014, UK). After cooking, samples were cooled in a circulatory water bath set at 18 ∘ C during a period of 30 min and the percentage cooking loss was recorded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%