2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00252-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mecamylamine Blockade of Both Positive and Negative Effects of IV Nicotine in Human Volunteers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1997;Heishman and Henningfield 2000). Notably, aversion in humans (Lundahl et al 2000) and experimental animals (Fudala et al 1985;Risinger and Oaks 1995;Risinger and Brown 1996;Gommans et al 2000;Shoaib et al 2002;Pescatore et al 2005;Le Foll and Goldberg 2005) has been observed with relatively high doses of nicotine, in concurrence with our observation that high doses of nicotine enhance Dyn synthesis and release in the striatum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…1997;Heishman and Henningfield 2000). Notably, aversion in humans (Lundahl et al 2000) and experimental animals (Fudala et al 1985;Risinger and Oaks 1995;Risinger and Brown 1996;Gommans et al 2000;Shoaib et al 2002;Pescatore et al 2005;Le Foll and Goldberg 2005) has been observed with relatively high doses of nicotine, in concurrence with our observation that high doses of nicotine enhance Dyn synthesis and release in the striatum.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The effect of mecamylamine could not be readily attributed to its nonspecific impairment of general locomotor activity since it only inhibited responding at the active lever, while inactive lever responding remained unchanged (slightly but not significantly higher than saline group), and previous observations have shown that this agent did not influence operant responding for food reinforcement at the dose used in the present study (Mansbach et al 2000). In light of the fact that mecamylamine has been found in animal studies to completely inhibit the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine (Mansbach et al 2000;Varvel et al 1999) and decrease nicotine intake in the nicotine self-administration paradigms (e.g., Corrigall and Coen 1989;Donny et al 1999;Glick et al 2002;Watkins et al 1999) and in human behavioral pharmacological tests to reduce the desire to smoke (Rose et al 1989) and satisfaction derived from smoking (Lundahl et al 2000;Nemeth-Coslett et al 1986), the present finding may suggest clinical potential of this agent for, in addition to its smoking-attenuating effect, treatment and prevention of relapse to smoking in abstinent smokers. However, since nicotinic neurotransmission has been implicated in mediating processes of cognitive attention, associative learning, and memory (Blokland 1995;Olausson et al 2003;Rezvani and Levin 2001), it is possible that the reinstatement-attenuation by mecamylamine can be due to its general inhibitory effect on the conditioned goal-directed responses rather than a specific action on cue-induced nicotineseeking.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Mecamylamine was selected as the nAChR antagonist because it has been reported to completely inhibit the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine (Mansbach et al, 2000;Varvel et al, 1999) and decrease nicotine self-administration in animals (Corrigall and Coen, 1989;Donny et al, 1999;Shoaib et al, 1997;Watkins et al, 1999). In humans, mecamylamine reduces self-reported nicotine-liking and estimates of dose strength following nicotine infusion (Rose et al, 1995), the desire to smoke (Rose et al, 1989), and satisfaction derived from smoking (Lundahl et al, 2000;Nemeth-Coslett et al, 1986;Rose et al, 1994). Pretreatment with this agent (0.5-2.0 mg/kg) before behavioral tests dose-dependently attenuated response-reinstatement induced by presentation of the nicotine-associated cue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%