Mechanical and chemical properties of Gold cultivar pineapple flesh (Ananas comosus)

Montero‐Calderón, Marta; Rojas‐Graü, María Alejandra; Martı́n-Belloso, Olga

doi:10.1007/s00217-009-1207-9

Cited by 29 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the study by Kongsuwan et al (2009), vitamin C content was 188.8 and 64.5µg/g in 'Phulae' and 'Nanglae' pineapple cultivars respectively. Another study also reported that vitamin C content in 'Gold' pineapple ranged from 305 -333µg/g (Montero-Calderon et al 2010). Higher vitamin C content (28% higher on average) in organic vegetables as well as higher dry matter content (23% higher) despite the lower yield (24% lower) has been reported by earlier studies (Williams et al 2000).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 68%

Nutritional attributes, bioactive components and overall acceptability of pineapple grown under different farming system

Mishra

2017

JANS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nutritional attributes, bioactive components and sensory qualities of pineapple (kew variety) grown under fertilizer based and traditional (organic by default) farming system were determined and compared in this study. The results revealed that organically grown (without adding any chemical inputs as per traditional practices) pineapple had significantly higher bioactive components (vitamin c and total soluble phenolics ranging from 23.19 % to 24.04 % and 28.69 mg/100g FW to 29.54 mg/100g fresh weight (FW) respectively for organically grown fruits and 19.84% to 20.01% and 21.32 mg/100g FW to 21.93 mg/100g FW respectively in conventionally grown in fruits). The study also reports that the organically grown pineapples had significantly higher overall acceptability (4.5 and 4.3 in 2013 and 2014 respectively) and popularity (4.26 and 4.32 in 2013 and 2014 respectively) as compared to the pineapples grown under conventional farming system using fertilizers (2.8 overall acceptability in 2013 and 2014; 2.96 and 2.86 popularity in 2013 and 2014 respectively).

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 68%

Nutritional attributes, bioactive components and overall acceptability of pineapple grown under different farming system

Mishra

2017

JANS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…& Zucc) (Yang et al, 2007), apple (Alvarez et al, 2002;Guine et al, 2011;Mehinagic et al, 2004;Zdunek and Bednarczyk, 2006), grape (Maury et al, 2009;Zouid et al, 2013), pineapple (MonteroCalderon et al, 2010), mango (Al-Haq andSugiyama, 2004), banana (Kajuna et al, 1997), date (Rahman and Al-Farsi, 2005;Singh et al, 2013), pear (Cho et al, 2010), blueberry (Chiabrando et al, 2009), and peach (Contador et al, 2015b). TPA has also been compared with simple compression tests (Fiszman and Damasio, 2000b) on pear (Salvador et al, 2007), mango (Al-Haq and Sugiyama, 2004), pineapple (Montero-Calderon et al, 2010), and blueberry (Li et al, 2011). When we are evaluating FFF with different maturity levels within a batch, the second peak of the TPA curve, corresponding to the maximum force of the second compression phase (F2), is quite useful because the variability due to the initial firmness among samples is attenuated; this is because F2 is assessed on the sample that has already been smashed (Contador et al, 2015b).…”

Section: Rheology Studies On Fruitsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Texture phenotyping in fresh fleshy fruit

Contador

Shinya

Infante

2015

Scientia Horticulturae

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…According to this it is important to assess the magnitude of changes in the variables related to mechanical strength during the fruit storage period. [11] There were several studies in the literature focusing on characterizing basic mechanical properties as a function of loading location and orientation for some plant materials such as peach, [11] cucumber, [17] pear, [18] carrot, [19] potato, [20] pineapple, [21] pomegranate, [22] and tomato. [23] It is revealed from the literature that so far, the information related to the effect of storage and loading location on mechanical responses of eggplant tissues is lacking.…”

Section: International Journal Of Food Propertiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Loading Position and Storage Duration on the Textural Properties of Eggplant

Ashtiani

Golzarian

Motie

et al. 2015

International Journal of Food Properties

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eggplant has a very limited shelf life and, like other vegetables, is susceptible to different types of damage during and after harvest operations. Besides, according to the inner construction of eggplant fruit, it can be regarded as an inhomogeneous system. It is therefore important to specify how storage might affect their mechanical properties and how they vary in morphology.In this work, eggplants were divided into three portions along the longitudinal axis and their textural properties were separately investigated using different types of test over a 10-day period of storage at ~11˚C and ~90% relative humidity (RH). The results showed that the tension strength, rupture force and Young's modulus of skin tissue decreased with increasing the length of storage period, and they were generally different in the different portions of the fruit that were sampled as these properties in the upper section were larger than those of the middle and bottom sections. The values of Young's modulus and rupture force of pulp tissue taken from compression tests decreased from 1.466 to 0.821 MPa and 20.70 to 17.66 N for upper section, 0.637 to 0.536 MPa and 15.33 to 13.13 N for middle section and 0.518 to 0.422 MPa and 14.19 International Journal of Food Properties A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t 2 to 12.19 N for bottom section, respectively with the increase in storage period. Similarly, as the samples were stored longer, the Young's modulus and rupture force of their combined skin and pulp tissues, obtained from penetration tests, decreased from 3.01 to 2.02 MPa and 31.21 to 24.95 N for upper section, 2.59 to 1.66 MPa and 28.64 to 21.66 N for middle section and 1.91 to 1.15 MPa and 23.18 to 17.37 N for bottom section, respectively. It was concluded that the mechanical resistance noticeably decreased towards the bottom third of the fruit.

show abstract

Mechanical and chemical properties of Gold cultivar pineapple flesh (Ananas comosus)

Cited by 29 publications

References 32 publications

Nutritional attributes, bioactive components and overall acceptability of pineapple grown under different farming system

Nutritional attributes, bioactive components and overall acceptability of pineapple grown under different farming system

Texture phenotyping in fresh fleshy fruit

Effect of Loading Position and Storage Duration on the Textural Properties of Eggplant

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About