Comprehensive Physiology 1986
DOI: 10.1002/cphy.cp030323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical and Electrical Properties of Respiratory Muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 186 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings agree with this postulate: 4 weeks of normobaric hypoxia did not change endurance of the mouse diaphragm in vitro , whereas the soleus fatigues more rapidly. While this result could be explained at least in part by inherent differences in oxidative capacity between the two muscles [46;51], we found evidence of further adaptation of the mouse diaphragm to chronic hypoxia. One such example is the reduction in fiber cross sectional area in the Hypoxia diaphragm, but not in triceps surae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Our findings agree with this postulate: 4 weeks of normobaric hypoxia did not change endurance of the mouse diaphragm in vitro , whereas the soleus fatigues more rapidly. While this result could be explained at least in part by inherent differences in oxidative capacity between the two muscles [46;51], we found evidence of further adaptation of the mouse diaphragm to chronic hypoxia. One such example is the reduction in fiber cross sectional area in the Hypoxia diaphragm, but not in triceps surae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Baken and colleagues also found that the form of prephonatory movements of the rib cage and abdomen was not influenced by respiratory phase or volume, although movement times were longer if the subjects were at low lung volumes at the time the stimulus was received (Baken et al, 1979). The finding that the form of prephonatory movements was not influenced by respiratory phase or volume is surprising because the pressures generated by active muscle forces and the passive mechanical properties of the chest wall change significantly throughout the quiet breathing cycle (Sharp & Hyatt, 1986;Smith & Loring, 1986). One might predict, therefore, that the form of prephonatory movements would be influenced, at least in part, by the respiratory phase at the time of voice initiation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The force developed by contracting muscles is proportional to their IEMG activity under both isometric and isotonic conditions (18,21,25). The rate of rise or slope of the IEMG activity reflects the rate of recruitment of motor units, as well as the increase in their firing frequency, while IEMG P is an expression of the total number of units recruited and of their maximal firing frequency (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%