2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.04.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical and thermal properties of reduced graphene oxide reinforced aluminum nitride ceramic composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…% rGO composite). Although rGO results an excellent reinforcement for ceramics [9][10]23 , it has the disadvantage of its quite low thermal conductivity, for example, a value of   0.2 W m -1 K -1 has been stated for thermally reduced rGO films at 1000 C for through-plane orientation 24 , which is one order of magnitude lower than the through-plane thermal conductivity estimated for pristine GNPs, 6-10 W m -1 K -1 20 . Actually, only one report 25 gives  values for the in-plane heat flow situation of GNP/AlN (with 5% wt.Y 2 O 3 ) composites (hot pressed at 1900 °C for 2h), showing an important decrease from 135 (bare matrix) to 50 W m -1 K -1 (10 wt.% GNP composite), close to the results they reported for the through-plane orientation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…% rGO composite). Although rGO results an excellent reinforcement for ceramics [9][10]23 , it has the disadvantage of its quite low thermal conductivity, for example, a value of   0.2 W m -1 K -1 has been stated for thermally reduced rGO films at 1000 C for through-plane orientation 24 , which is one order of magnitude lower than the through-plane thermal conductivity estimated for pristine GNPs, 6-10 W m -1 K -1 20 . Actually, only one report 25 gives  values for the in-plane heat flow situation of GNP/AlN (with 5% wt.Y 2 O 3 ) composites (hot pressed at 1900 °C for 2h), showing an important decrease from 135 (bare matrix) to 50 W m -1 K -1 (10 wt.% GNP composite), close to the results they reported for the through-plane orientation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…% Y 2 O 3 ) prepared by hot pressing at 1850 °C in N 2 atmosphere for 1 h. In the same way, Xia el al. 23 reported decreases of  from 92.5…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The stacking of GNSs and the agglomeration of CNTs reduced the reinforcing effects on the mechanical properties. 39,40 It seemed that both GNSs and CNTs were homogeneously dispersed in the S5 scaffold and almost no agglomeration of GNSs and CNTs was observed θ ° Figure 2 XrD patterns and raman spectra of the raw powder and scaffolds. Notes: (A) XrD patterns of the raw powder and composite scaffolds, and (B) raman spectra of gNs and cNT powder and s2, s4, and s6 scaffolds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a). In order to compare the hardness value with other results, the hardness values of a graphene-like 2D nanomaterial-reinforced CMC are listed in Table S2583334434445464748495051525354. Although no BNNP/ceramic results are given, the two samples show a consistent tendency in terms of their hardness levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%