MECHANICAL AND THERMAL SHOCK TESTS ON CERAMIC INSULATING MATERIALS<sup>1</sup>

Kraner, Hobart M.; Snyder, R. A.

doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1931.tb16675.x

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1936

2009

Publication Types

Select...

Book3

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sometimes the data were comparable and in other cases they were not. One study on porcelain [21] suggested round rod test data were superior, but this was probably due to the warpage of the rectangular specimens and the use of nonarticulating fixtures or due to intrinsic strength differences between the two specimen types. Cylindrical and square asfired reaction bonded silicon nitride specimens were tested for comparison by Newnham [22].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Flexural Strength of Ceramic and Glass Rods

Quinn

Sparenberg

Koshy

et al. 2009

Journal of Testing and Evaluation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Flexural testing is the most common method used to measure the uniaxial tensile strength of ceramics and glasses. Although standard test methods have been developed for rectangular specimens, cylindrical rod specimens may be preferred in many cases. This paper summarizes how rods have been tested in the past, identifies key experimental errors and remedies, and serves as the foundation for a new standard test method for ceramics and glasses.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%