2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical aspects of dental implants and osseointegration: A narrative review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
108
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
2
108
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the materials used in orthopedics with these fines, titanium and its alloys play an important role, due to their excellent mechanical and corrosion resistance and their adequate biological behavior [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. However, this presents two important disadvantages, among others: on the one hand, the stiffness of titanium (Ti) is higher (100-110 GPa) than the cortical bone (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), which produces the stress-shielding phenomenon, promoting bone resorption surrounding the implant and compromising, in these cases, the functionality of the implants [11]; on the other hand, the inert biological character of titanium surfaces results in a poor cellular interaction between Ti and host bone tissue-an outcome that can affect the proper reconstruction of bone, resulting in implant loosening [12]. For these reasons, the development of Ti implants with satisfactory Young's modulus and best cellular interaction for bone tissue replacement remains a challenge to be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the materials used in orthopedics with these fines, titanium and its alloys play an important role, due to their excellent mechanical and corrosion resistance and their adequate biological behavior [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. However, this presents two important disadvantages, among others: on the one hand, the stiffness of titanium (Ti) is higher (100-110 GPa) than the cortical bone (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), which produces the stress-shielding phenomenon, promoting bone resorption surrounding the implant and compromising, in these cases, the functionality of the implants [11]; on the other hand, the inert biological character of titanium surfaces results in a poor cellular interaction between Ti and host bone tissue-an outcome that can affect the proper reconstruction of bone, resulting in implant loosening [12]. For these reasons, the development of Ti implants with satisfactory Young's modulus and best cellular interaction for bone tissue replacement remains a challenge to be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, most studies recommend curettage of the implant site before placement or suggest antibiotics to aid the success rate of immediate implant placement [ 44 ]. During the primary stability, the outer implant threads are in close proximity with the surrounding bone, providing mechanical interlocking between the bone and implant [ 45 , 46 ]. However, the inner surfaces of the threads are unable to have an implant-to-bone contact and the void formed will be occupied with blood, subsequently forming into a blood clot characterized by a fibrin coagulum with thrombocytes, neutrophils, erythrocytes and macrophages/monocytes [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fibrin coagulum network will progressively form into granulation tissue when penetration of vascular units and fibroblast-like cells is initiated. This initial wound healing response will start the bone apposition between the implant and the surrounding bone, indicating the build-up of the secondary stability [ 45 , 46 ]. On the contrary, when in presence of infection, sites showing pathology may increase the risk of microbial interference with the initial wound healing [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, poor bone ingrowth, linked for instance to increased implant micromotion, still compromises the long-term stability of the implant and leads to loosening and secondary surgery ( Mathieu et al, 2014 ). Understanding the integration process and the strength of the newly formed bone-implant interface may help improve implant designs and surgical strategies in order to enhance prosthesis integration ( Alenezi et al, 2018 ; Hanawa, 2019 ; Li et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%