2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical behavior of concrete-filled square steel tube with FRP-confined concrete core subjected to axial compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While structures made of conventional materials may exhibit some postyield stiffness (usually less than 10% of the initial stiffness), the application of new materials with high strength and superior elastic properties can easily be used to develop structures with a much higher and more stable postyield stiffness. These high‐strength elastic materials, such as fiber‐reinforced polymer (FRP) and high‐strength steel bars, exhibit little or approximately no plastic behavior and have been recently used to fabricate many novel materials, members, and structures. Compared with the components made of only conventional materials (steel and concrete), increasingly more materials, members, and structures that incorporate both high‐strength elastic materials and conventional materials show significant postyield hardening (PYH) skeleton curves (Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While structures made of conventional materials may exhibit some postyield stiffness (usually less than 10% of the initial stiffness), the application of new materials with high strength and superior elastic properties can easily be used to develop structures with a much higher and more stable postyield stiffness. These high‐strength elastic materials, such as fiber‐reinforced polymer (FRP) and high‐strength steel bars, exhibit little or approximately no plastic behavior and have been recently used to fabricate many novel materials, members, and structures. Compared with the components made of only conventional materials (steel and concrete), increasingly more materials, members, and structures that incorporate both high‐strength elastic materials and conventional materials show significant postyield hardening (PYH) skeleton curves (Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the components made of only conventional materials (steel and concrete), increasingly more materials, members, and structures that incorporate both high‐strength elastic materials and conventional materials show significant postyield hardening (PYH) skeleton curves (Figure ). A variety of such innovative components are summarized in Table (references cited in Table ). These materials, members, and structures can be called PYH materials, members, and structures, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karimi et al [18] proposed a type of FRP-encased steel-concrete composite columns in which a circular FRP was placed around the steel I-section and had the concrete filled between the steel I-section and the FRP tube. Feng et al [19] proposed a steel-concrete-FRP-concrete column which had a square steel tube as the outer layer and a circular filament-wound FRP tube as the inner layer, with concrete filled both between these two layers and within the FRP tube. e results of these studies showed that the strength of concrete, FRP, and steel could be effectively utilized in the composite columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stiffness, strength, ductility, seismic and fire resistance, deformation characteristics, elimination of formwork costs, installation, economy, and good performance are among the advantages achieved in using such a structural system. Accordingly, a great deal of experimental research works has been done by Zeghiche and Chaoui (2005), Ellobody et al (2006), Yang and Han (2006), Guo et al (2007), Lai and Ho (2014), Feng et al (2015), and Wang et al (2015) among many others, to investigate the behaviour of CFST columns. Alternatively, much numerical research work has been reported by Shams and Saadeghvaziri (1999), Hu et al (2003), Valipour and Foster (2010), Liang (2011), Tao et al (2013), Wang and Young (2013), Patel et al (2014), Zhang et al (2015), Aslani et al (2015), and analytical studies by Choi and Xiao (2010), Schneider (1998), Brauns (1999, Susantha et al (2001), Fam et al (2004), Kuranovas et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%