1994
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90040-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical behavior of damaged trabecular bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
92
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following vertebral compressive fracture, there is a substantial reduction in mechanical strength and stiffness [2,3,4,13,24,25,33]. In this study, a microstructural FE model and microdamage scheme [19,22] were used to simulate the effects of parapedicular vertebroplasty on thoracic vertebral body mechanical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following vertebral compressive fracture, there is a substantial reduction in mechanical strength and stiffness [2,3,4,13,24,25,33]. In this study, a microstructural FE model and microdamage scheme [19,22] were used to simulate the effects of parapedicular vertebroplasty on thoracic vertebral body mechanical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During that phase, the aggregated particles were probably becoming more damaged. Structurally damaged cancellous bone is known to have a much lower elastic modulus (Keaveny et al 1994). However, on impacting the graft layer, such damage would be compensated by the ongoing slow rise in compactness of the morselized grafts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specimens were loaded in compression three times from 0 to 0.4% strain at a rate of 0.5% per second, and the apparent Young's modulus was calculated from a second order polynomial fit to the stress strain data over a strain range from 0 to 0.2% (Morgan, et al, 2001). Next, damage was induced by overloading the specimens in compression to 3% strain at 0.5% strain per second, which has been shown to induce microdamage in trabecular bone (Arthur Moore and Gibson, 2002;Keaveny, et al, 1994;Wang, X and Niebur, 2006). The damaged Young's modulus was subsequently measured with three additional non-destructive loading cycles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%