2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical behaviour of glued-in rods (carbon and glass fibre-reinforced polymers) for timber structures—An analytical and experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the mechanical properties of reinforced beams were improved by reducing the effect of stress concentration. According to Titirla et al [62], the maximum load of the structure had a great relationship with the diameter of FRP bars and the grain direction of the wood. Al-Hayek et al [63] compared beams reinforced with draped CFRP, straight CFRP bars, draped steel wire and straight steel wire.…”
Section: Timber Beams Reinforced With Frp Barsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the mechanical properties of reinforced beams were improved by reducing the effect of stress concentration. According to Titirla et al [62], the maximum load of the structure had a great relationship with the diameter of FRP bars and the grain direction of the wood. Al-Hayek et al [63] compared beams reinforced with draped CFRP, straight CFRP bars, draped steel wire and straight steel wire.…”
Section: Timber Beams Reinforced With Frp Barsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beams of the panels are the part that is being connected with the columns of the structures. The stiffness of these connections can varies as it depends on the type of the connection as Titirla et al have been presented [20][21][22][23], but in this study only the case of a rigid connection was presented.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFRPs exhibited consistently higher pull-out loads when glued perpendicular to the grain with a maximum increase up to 26% for a bonded length equivalent to three times the plate width. However, GFRP rods showed a 34% higher axial load capacity in (Titirla et al 2019) (glulam GL24h) compared with CFRP rods at a bonded length of 15D, where D is the rod diameter. The differences in the reported bond strength trends among studies can be attributed to differences in the bond test method ('pull-compression' vs 'pull-pull' test method) and geometry of the FRP reinforcement (rectangular vs circular).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%