Mechanical Characterization of Polymers on a Nanometer Scale through Nanoindentation. A Study on Pile-up and Viscoelasticity

Abstract

The analysis of nanoindentation force curves collected on polymers through the common Oliver and Pharr procedure does not lead to a correct evaluation of Young's modulus. In particular, the estimated elastic modulus is several times larger than the correct one, thus compromising the possibility of a nanomechanical characterization of polymers. Pile-up or viscoelasticity is usually blamed for this failure, and a deep analysis of their influences is attempted in this work. Piling-up can be minimized by indenting on a true nanometer scale, i.e., at penetration depth smaller than 200 nm. On the other side, it is common knowledge that fast indentations minimize the effect of viscoelasticity. However, changing the indentation time in a broad range of contact time (fractions of second up to hundreds of seconds) did not allow the correct estimation of Young's modulus for the polymers used in this work. The final result is that the Oliver and Pharr procedure as well as any other procedure analyzing the unloading curve with elastic contact mechanics models cannot be employed to measure Young's modulus of polymers because its application is incorrect from a theoretical point of view, unless the analysis is limited to the very first nanometers of penetration depth when the contact is perfectly elastic. Viscoelastic contact mechanics models should instead be employed to characterize these materials.

Evidence for a material gradient in the adhesive tarsal setae of the ladybird beetle Coccinella septempunctata

“…In such a case, the Hertz contact model is applicable 45 . In addition, this model is generally valid for indentation measurements conducted with both the circular paraboloid-shaped indenter tip and the small indentation depth used in our study 52,53 . Based on the application of the Hertz contact model, we determined the Young's modulus, as previously described 54 , by …”

Nanomodified Adhesive Composition for Aeronautical Structures Based on Polymer Composite Materials

“…It is discussed in the literature (Tranchida et al, 2006;2007;Oyen and Cook, 2003;Panich and Yong, 2005) that this model not quite adequately allows evaluating the mechanical properties of polymeric materials. The necessity of adjusting standard experimental parameters is reported in order to avoid manifestations of so-called "nose effect", when, during the unloading cycle the load decreases linearly and insertion continues to increase.…”

Probing polymer chain constraint and synergistic effects in nylon 6-clay nanocomposites and nylon 6-silica flake sub-micro composites with nanomechanics

“…Bell 2 , Yalan Tait 3 , and Fengge Gao 3 1 Nanomechanical testing provides a convenient route to testing the mechanical behavior of novel polymer nanocomposites [14][15][16][17][18] since only very small volumes are required. As a surface-sensitive technique, it can provide information about surface mechanical properties more relevant to applications involving surface contact loading (e.g.…”

“…This more commonly occurs when (i) the holding period is too short, (ii) and/or the loading rate is too high, (iii) and/or the indentation depth is lower than ~ 200 nm. 17,35,36 To avoid any of these artifacts influencing the measurements in this study the load vs. time protocol has been designed to (i) load sufficiently slowly (50 s), (ii) hold for a long time at peak load (120 s), and (iii) indent sufficiently deep (2-3 μm).…”