2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical characterization of rubble stone masonry walls using non and minor destructive tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to this fact, in this case, the compressive strength was estimated following the suggestion of Lombillo et al 19,25 by fitting a logarithmic curve on the non-linear region of the envelope loading cycles (stress-strain relationship) and considering the maximum stress associated with a deformation of 3‰ as proposed in. 19,25 Test on rubble stone masonry walls A total of four tests were performed on walls made with rubble limestone with air lime mortar: one test on the back façade wall of the ''Pombalino'' building (P.1) and three tests on the side external wall of the ''Gaioleiro'' building (G.1, G.2, and G.3). The test setup (test P.1 as an example) and the relationship between the average stress in the masonry (σ m ) and the average vertical strain (ε V ) for both cycles of pressure are displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Double Flat-jack Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this fact, in this case, the compressive strength was estimated following the suggestion of Lombillo et al 19,25 by fitting a logarithmic curve on the non-linear region of the envelope loading cycles (stress-strain relationship) and considering the maximum stress associated with a deformation of 3‰ as proposed in. 19,25 Test on rubble stone masonry walls A total of four tests were performed on walls made with rubble limestone with air lime mortar: one test on the back façade wall of the ''Pombalino'' building (P.1) and three tests on the side external wall of the ''Gaioleiro'' building (G.1, G.2, and G.3). The test setup (test P.1 as an example) and the relationship between the average stress in the masonry (σ m ) and the average vertical strain (ε V ) for both cycles of pressure are displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Double Flat-jack Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the chemical composition of different rubble stone masonry walls located in Santander, Northern Spain was systematically evaluated via PXRD analysis, as shown in Fig. 19 [253]. It can be observed that the limestone (Fig.…”
Section: Powder X-ray Diffraction Spectroscopy (Pxrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flat-jack technique has been widely and successfully applied in several past studies, namely in regular brick and stone masonry walls [15]. However, the use of this technique in irregular stone masonry has been the subject of relatively few studies [13,[16][17][18][19]. In these walls, not complying with all standards' requirements is a contingency that must be taken into account.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterization Of Stone Masonry Walls Through Fmentioning
confidence: 99%