2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.02.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical characterization of the static and fatigue compressive properties of a new glass/flax/epoxy composite material using digital image correlation, thermographic stress analysis, and conventional mechanical testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher fiber volume fraction and cross-ply fiber layers in Type B compared with Type A increased fiber interlocking and, thus, decreased the amount of matrix embedded in the fibers. 35 These findings agree with Manteghi et al 38 who found that glass/ flax/epoxy [0 glass =0 flax exhibited a much greater overall temperature increase than glass/flax/epoxy [0 glass =AE45 flax , suggesting that the major cause of energy dissipation is the viscoelastic properties of flax fibers, matrix deformation, crack initiation, and local viscous matrix heating. 37 TSA was a reliable tool to determine the HCFS of current composites (Figure 13, Table 2).…”
Section: Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The higher fiber volume fraction and cross-ply fiber layers in Type B compared with Type A increased fiber interlocking and, thus, decreased the amount of matrix embedded in the fibers. 35 These findings agree with Manteghi et al 38 who found that glass/ flax/epoxy [0 glass =0 flax exhibited a much greater overall temperature increase than glass/flax/epoxy [0 glass =AE45 flax , suggesting that the major cause of energy dissipation is the viscoelastic properties of flax fibers, matrix deformation, crack initiation, and local viscous matrix heating. 37 TSA was a reliable tool to determine the HCFS of current composites (Figure 13, Table 2).…”
Section: Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…carbon/flax/epoxy and glass/flax/epoxy) under constant stress-controlled fatigue, which showed nearly constant moduli until failure. 18,38 Similarly, some neat flax/epoxy composites previously exhibited stiffness trends similar to the current study under strain-controlled fatigue, 28,29 whereas others showed increasing stiffness under stress-controlled fatigue. 4,[23][24][25]29 As Mahboob et al 29 argue, neat flax/epoxy composites can experience increased stiffness during stress-controlled fatigue because of structural reorientation of microfibrils within the cell wall of flax fibers to be more inline with applied stress, although increasing strainamplitude (and consequently strain-rate) may also be a contributing factor.…”
Section: Practical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations