2017
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.13116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical circulatory support in patients with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract: Management of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with aortic stenosis and severe left ventricular dysfunction is challenging. Mechanical circulatory support at the time of percutaneous coronary interventions may be necessary in these extreme-risk patients. We present a case in which the TandemHeart was used to support a patient with severe aortic stenosis, severe protected left main and circumflex disease, and severe cardiomyopathy and review the literature on this subject.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, the patient was cannulated for peripheral VA ECMO. Mechanical circulatory support has also been useful in high‐risk patients undergoing TAVR and concomitant coronary artery stenting …”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the patient was cannulated for peripheral VA ECMO. Mechanical circulatory support has also been useful in high‐risk patients undergoing TAVR and concomitant coronary artery stenting …”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the risk of aortic dissection is small following TAVR, it may not be immediately recognized and the mortality is high . Unlike mechanical complications such as coronary artery obstruction or the presence of severe aortic stenosis, mechanical support will not result in hemodynamic stability . The use of a high‐profile delivery system during TAVR, such as the one used in this case, may lead to an aortic rupture in an acutely angled aortic arch, as was the case in our patient …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In this case, the left carotid artery was free from atherosclerotic disease, while the right subclavian artery was used as a potential cannulation site for the standby ECMO. Mechanical circulatory support has been shown to be effective in patients with decreased ventricular function undergoing complicated TAVR procedures . The CoreValve was chosen because it has a high profile that guarantees the fixation to the annulus and ascending aorta when calcifications are absent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%