Mechanical considerations for the implant tooth-supported fixed partial denture

An Investigation of Tooth/Implant‐Supported Fixed Prosthesis Designs with Two Different Stress Analysis Methods: An in vitro Study

“…These results are compatible with previous studies. Breeding et al evaluated different TIFP designs and reported no differences between the TIFP designs with the RC and the NRC that were placed on the natural tooth side 51 . Misch and Ismail also had similar results with 3D FEM analysis 29 …”

“…We observed stress increase on the mesiocervical surface of the implant supports with all TIFP designs in both PSAM and in FEM models. The implants' movement in alveolus is at the micron level due to the rigid anchorage between bone and implant 18,23,51 . While masticating forces intrude the natural tooth into alveolus, they may cause stresses with the implant supports.…”

Measurement of periapical pressure created by occlusal loading

“…The resin was used to simulate the surrounding bone structure. The Young's modulus of the cured resin was measured using the bending method, and was 8 Gpa, which is in the range reported for bone (Breeding et al . 1995).…”

Tooth‐to‐Implant Connection: A Systematic Review of the Literature and a Case Report Utilizing a New Connection Design

“…The latter conclusion is supported also photoelastically 36 . Regarding the tooth, it seems that its movement patterns are not significantly influenced by the mode of connection 37 . From a clinical perspective, there are several trials that have used a connection employing an attachment successfully 31,33,38,39 .…”

“…36 Regarding the tooth, it seems that its movement patterns are not significantly influenced by the mode of connection. 37 From a clinical perspective, there are several trials that have used a connection employing an attachment successfully. 31,33,38,39 An unpleasant complication that has been observed is intrusion of the natural tooth segment 20,31,[40][41][42][43][44] (Figure 1).…”