Mechanical Design of a Cable Climbing Robot for Inspection on a Cable-Stayed Bridge

Zheng, Zhenliang; Yuan, Xiaoqiang; Huang, Huanhui; Yu, Xiao; Ding, Ning

doi:10.1109/wcica.2018.8630709

Cited by 12 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Accordingly, the application of robotic technology is growing rapidly, for which only a limited amount of time is required to collect necessary data with a variety of sensors. The increased focus on robotics equipment, semi-autonomous or fully autonomous, for the NDE of bridge infrastructure, has led to the providing of previously inaccessible bridge areas with faster and more accurate inspections [95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107]. The automated robotic equipment must be a certain weight and size, implementing specific modes of operation, power supply, types of data collection, and accuracy [111], and, currently, not all NDT methods can be accommodated by robotic delivery.…”

Section: Implementation Of Robotic Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-Destructive Testing Applications for Steel Bridges

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The growing population and increasing demand for surface transportation have highlighted the importance of maintaining safe and reliable civil infrastructures for daily use. Among all civil infrastructures, bridges are one of the most important elements in the transportation system. As such, to prevent any failures caused by aging and environmental impacts, bridges require periodic inspections. This becomes even more critical due to climate change and its effect on bridges, especially in the coastal regions. Most of the inspections conducted incorporate the visual type of evaluation due to its simplicity. However, with the current developments in new technologies, there is a need for more advanced techniques of structural health monitoring (SHM) methods to be incorporated in the maintenance programs for more accurate and efficient surveys. In this paper, non-destructive testing (NDT) methods applicable to steel bridges are reviewed, with a focus on methods applicable to local damage detection. Moreover, the methodology, advantages and disadvantages, and up-to-date research on NDT methods are presented. Furthermore, the application of novel NDT techniques using innovative sensors, drones, and robots for the rapid and efficient assessment of damages on small and large scales is emphasized. This study is deemed necessary as it compiles in one place the available information regarding NDT methods for in-service steel bridges. Access to such information is critical for researchers who intend to work on new or improved NDT techniques.

show abstract

Section: Implementation Of Robotic Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-Destructive Testing Applications for Steel Bridges

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is for this reason that different types of climbing and aerial robots have been used to facilitate these tasks. In particular, the versatility of the aerial robots has allowed their increased utilization for the inspection of the different parts of bridges, such as the inaccessible underside of the bridge decks, higher parts of the bridge beams and cables [40,49,[63][64][65][66][67]86]. Similarly, a number of different wheel-based and legged robots have also been used for inspecting concrete bridge decks, steel wires, concrete underside, and steel beams.…”

Section: Technological Platformsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In recent decades, there has been an increased focus towards the development and usage of semi-autonomous and fully autonomous robots for the NDE and SHM of civil infrastructures in general and bridges in particular. A wide array of diverse robots have been developed ranging from climbing robots (e.g., legged robots, wheel-based sliding robots and crawler robots) [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ], and multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles (e.g., quad-rotors and octo-rotors) [ 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ] to unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) (e.g., advanced robotics and automation (ARA) lab robot, robotic crack inspection and mapping (ROCIM) , robotics-assisted bridge inspection tool (RABIT)) [ 45 , 47 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ] and water-based robotic crafts (e.g., unmanned submersible vehicles (USVs), underwater marine vehicles (UMVs), underwater vehicles (UUVs)) [ 41 , 42 , 80 ].…”

Section: Technological Platformsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A number of different robot platforms are designed for inspection activities for specific types of bridges (e.g., cantilever, arch, suspension, truss, cable-stayed, beam, girder and tied-arch bridges) [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 58 , 59 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 73 , 87 ]. In order to provide some level of insight regarding the different robotic solutions for bridge inspection, the proceeding discussion will focus on the taxonomy provided in Figure 6 , namely: (i) ground robots, (ii) aerial robots, and (iii) marine robots.…”

Section: Technological Platformsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…legged robots, wheel-based sliding robots and crawler robots) [38][39][40][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62], and multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles (e.g., quad-rotors and octo-rotors) [63][64][65][66][67][68][69] to unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) (e.g., advanced robotics and automation (ARA) lab robot, robotic crack inspection and mapping (ROCIM), robotics-assisted bridge inspection tool (RABIT)) [45,47,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] and water-based robotic crafts (e.g., unmanned submersible vehicles (USVs), underwater marine vehicles (UMVs), underwater vehicles (UUVs)) [41,42,80]. Some of the recent studies have also focused towards developing hybrid robotic frameworks (e.g., wall-climbing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), robots capable of flying and crawling and other multi-rotor flying robots capable of latching on to specific parts of infrastructure that require inspection), which are able to provide multi-functional roles and capabilities for the different types of inspection activities [43,…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Review of Non-Destructive Civil Infrastructure Evaluation for Bridges: State-of-the-Art Robotic Platforms, Sensors and Algorithms

Ahmed

Gucunski

2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The non-destructive evaluation (NDE) of civil infrastructure has been an active area of research in recent decades. The traditional inspection of civil infrastructure mostly relies on visual inspection using human inspectors. To facilitate this process, different sensors for data collection and techniques for data analyses have been used to effectively carry out this task in an automated fashion. This review-based study will examine some of the recent developments in the field of autonomous robotic platforms for NDE and the structural health monitoring (SHM) of bridges. Some of the salient features of this review-based study will be discussed in the light of the existing surveys and reviews that have been published in the recent past, which will enable the clarification regarding the novelty of the present review-based study. The review methodology will be discussed in sufficient depth, which will provide insights regarding some of the primary aspects of the review methodology followed by this review-based study. In order to provide an in-depth examination of the state-of-the-art, the current research will examine the three major research streams. The first stream relates to technological robotic platforms developed for NDE of bridges. The second stream of literature examines myriad sensors used for the development of robotic platforms for the NDE of bridges. The third stream of literature highlights different algorithms for the surface- and sub-surface-level analysis of bridges that have been developed by studies in the past. A number of challenges towards the development of robotic platforms have also been discussed.

show abstract