2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-021-02805-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Effects of a Maylard Scar During a Vaginal Birth After a Previous Caesarean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gravidity may intricately correlate with physiological elements, such as uterine status, uterine musculature elasticity, and ligamentous tension, all of which collectively influence the likelihood of a successful vaginal birth. 38 Furthermore, our current study's SHAP analysis demonstrated that a history of successful vaginal births significantly impacts the VBAC success. Women with such a history may possess more favorable birth canals, thereby increasing the likelihood of a successful current vaginal delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Gravidity may intricately correlate with physiological elements, such as uterine status, uterine musculature elasticity, and ligamentous tension, all of which collectively influence the likelihood of a successful vaginal birth. 38 Furthermore, our current study's SHAP analysis demonstrated that a history of successful vaginal births significantly impacts the VBAC success. Women with such a history may possess more favorable birth canals, thereby increasing the likelihood of a successful current vaginal delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The conference also highlighted newer clinical application areas such as reproduction and pregnancy. For instance, Fidalgo et al 4 investigated scarring due to a Cesarean section through a computational biomechanics model of delivery. Finally, in silico trials are emerging as a powerful tool as shown by Favre et al 3 who provided a perspective on in silico clinical trials for orthopedic devices, highlighting challenges and potential benefits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%