48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Erosion of Nozzle Material in Solid-Propellant Rocket Motors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another material removal process is the mechanical erosion caused by the impingement of alumina particles. This effect, however, is negligible in the throat region and downstream, as the particles travel almost parallel to the surface [16]. The dominance of chemical erosion at the nozzle throat is confirmed by the fact that the throat erosion rate declines as aluminum content increases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another material removal process is the mechanical erosion caused by the impingement of alumina particles. This effect, however, is negligible in the throat region and downstream, as the particles travel almost parallel to the surface [16]. The dominance of chemical erosion at the nozzle throat is confirmed by the fact that the throat erosion rate declines as aluminum content increases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This model, based on the combined inviscid core flow and viscous boundary-layer flow equations, has been recently updated by Acharya and Kuo [10][11][12]. Recent studies on non-charring carbonbased composite nozzle materials based on full Navier-Stokes approaches have been carried out by different research groups [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. The same kind of analysis, which is based on coupling a Navier-Stokes solution with surface ablation, cannot be found in open literature for erosion modeling of charring composite materials such as silica-and carbon-phenolics in SRM nozzles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model, based on the equations of combined inviscid core flow and viscous boundary layer flow, has recently been updated by Kuo and Keswani 11 and Acharya and Kuo. 12 Recent studies based on full Navier-Stokes approaches have been carried out independently by different research groups for carboncarbon and graphite nozzles [13][14][15][16] as well as for carbon-phenolic nozzles. 5,17 Ommati et al 18 found that the ablation rate of short carbon fiber/phenolic composites increased as pressure of the hot gas applied over the surface increased during oxyacetylene flame test, which was determined by both experimentally and mathematically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Recent studies based on full Navier-Stokes approaches have been carried out by different research groups. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The throat erosion represents the second most important loss in the Space Shuttle Booster RSRM nozzle 20 after the loss due to two-dimensional and two-phase flow. However, as previously stated, the specific impulse loss caused by throat erosion is strongly dependent upon the size of the system and the duration of the firing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%