2011
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201084202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical fabrication of carbon nanotube/TiO2 nanoparticle composite films and their field‐emission properties

Abstract: A simple mechanical rubbing method for fabricating films of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and CNTs‐based composite materials is presented, and films of CNTs, TiO2 nanoparticles, and CNTs‐TiO2 composite with different proportions are realized. The field emission (FE) properties of these films are systematically studied in comparison experiments. It is found that the TiO2 films show neglectable FE current in the electrical field up to 10 V/µm, and CNTs‐TiO2 composite films with an optimum proportion (7–10 wt.%) of TiO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the turn-on field (corresponding to 10 μA/cm 2 ) from sample II–QDs was 1.3 V/μm, which was much lower than that obtained from densified sample II (2.4 V/μm). This value was also comparable to that reported on hybrid CNT/TiO 2 nanoparticles composite film (turn-on was 1.3 V/μm). With an enhancement factor of 3014 ± 258, sample II–QDs exhibit much better field emission in comparison to densified sample II, whose enhancement factor was determined to be 1193 ± 108.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the turn-on field (corresponding to 10 μA/cm 2 ) from sample II–QDs was 1.3 V/μm, which was much lower than that obtained from densified sample II (2.4 V/μm). This value was also comparable to that reported on hybrid CNT/TiO 2 nanoparticles composite film (turn-on was 1.3 V/μm). With an enhancement factor of 3014 ± 258, sample II–QDs exhibit much better field emission in comparison to densified sample II, whose enhancement factor was determined to be 1193 ± 108.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Among the possible methods of characterizing the complex FE process are: the vacuum condition changes, 1 the influence of the emitter substrate temperature, 2 the visualization of the emission sites distribution, 3 the temperature allocation near the FE centers by means of infrared microscopy, 4 and by defining the volatile product composition by residual gas analysis methods. [4][5][6] Despite the progress in the use of mass spectrometer methods for the volatile product diagnostics accompanying FE, the number of such investigations is not enough.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%