2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70942-8_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Failure in Microstructural Heterogeneous Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case of LEFM, two sets of functions are used: a Heaviside jump function to capture the jump across the crack faces and asymptotic branch functions that span the two‐dimensional asymptotic crack tip fields (three‐dimensional methods have been proposed in 32 and applied to real‐life damage tolerance assessment 33, 34. The enriched approximation for LEFM takes the form 17, 35, 36 where a J and b αitalicK are nodal degrees of freedom corresponding to the Heaviside function H and the near‐tip functions, { B α } 1⩽α⩽4 , given by where ( r , θ) are the crack tip polar coordinates. Nodes in set 𝒩 c are such that their support is split by the crack and nodes in set 𝒩 f belong to the elements that contain a crack tip.…”
Section: Basics Of the Extended Finite Element Methods (Xfem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of LEFM, two sets of functions are used: a Heaviside jump function to capture the jump across the crack faces and asymptotic branch functions that span the two‐dimensional asymptotic crack tip fields (three‐dimensional methods have been proposed in 32 and applied to real‐life damage tolerance assessment 33, 34. The enriched approximation for LEFM takes the form 17, 35, 36 where a J and b αitalicK are nodal degrees of freedom corresponding to the Heaviside function H and the near‐tip functions, { B α } 1⩽α⩽4 , given by where ( r , θ) are the crack tip polar coordinates. Nodes in set 𝒩 c are such that their support is split by the crack and nodes in set 𝒩 f belong to the elements that contain a crack tip.…”
Section: Basics Of the Extended Finite Element Methods (Xfem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often difficult to ascertain compatibility between the different formats, which makes communicating CAD data often long and tedious. Level set and Partition of Unity technologies in association with digital imaging is being further developed in various research groups [18][19][20][21][22]. Research endeavours seem to tend toward the use of digital images to produce pixel (2D) or voxel (3D) data, which in turns permits an implicit definition of the part of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this technique and the rapidly growing power of computers (Moore's law predicts its doubling every 18 months), it will become increasingly easy to solve multi-million degree of freedom problems, fully continuum models of complex components would be seamlessly constructed. In addition, Partition of Unity technology is being further developed to include the effect of complex internal microstructures [18], which would allow the use of those models for advanced materials such as composite materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though numerous studies on crack problems have been conducted during the past decades using various methods such as conventional FEM [1][2][3], boundary element method [4][5][6], meshless method [7][8][9][10], extended finite element method (XFEM) [11][12][13][14], and finite 'crack' element method [15], most of those studies have been limited to the case of homogeneous materials with a few exceptions [16][17][18][19][20]. 0021 Recently, it has attracted an amount of substantial attention to explore the effect of microstructures on the macroscopic failure behavior of heterogeneous materials or structures [21][22][23][24]. This has been made possible due to the availability of increasingly strong computing powers and the development of new numerical schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%