2021
DOI: 10.1109/jphot.2021.3072847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Filter-Based Differential Pressure Fiber-Optic Fabry-Perot Infrasound Sensor

Abstract: A differential pressure fiber optic infrasound sensor based on a mechanical filter was developed, for the detection of infrasound within the frequency range of 0.01-1 Hz. The sensing unit employs a miniature polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) diaphragm which is fixed onto a glass ferrule. An extrinsic Fabry-Perot (F-P) interferometer was fabricated between the optical fiber end face and the PPS diaphragm, and a mechanical filter structure introduced to improve the minimum detectable frequency down to 0.005 Hz. Experi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where I is the intensity of the signal reflected by the sensor, I 0 is the intensity of the incident light, R is the reflectivity of interfaces, L is the length of the F-P cavity, and λ is the central wavelength of the DFB laser. When using intensity demodulation, we expect the sensor to work within the π/4 linear range centered on the maximum point of derivative of sinusoidal interference curve [26]. The expected cavity length of the sensor is analyzed according to (5), and the cavity length L should meet the following condition,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I is the intensity of the signal reflected by the sensor, I 0 is the intensity of the incident light, R is the reflectivity of interfaces, L is the length of the F-P cavity, and λ is the central wavelength of the DFB laser. When using intensity demodulation, we expect the sensor to work within the π/4 linear range centered on the maximum point of derivative of sinusoidal interference curve [26]. The expected cavity length of the sensor is analyzed according to (5), and the cavity length L should meet the following condition,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%