2016
DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.0656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Nasal Dilators for the Management of Nasal Obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient-reported outcome measures could be considered a more meaningful consideration compared with the objective measures of peak nasal flow or nasal resistance, particularly when considering a quality-of-life problem such as nasal valve compromise. However, currently available objective measures of nasal airflow have been shown to have poor correlation with patient perception of nasal airflow . The relative importance of the objective parameters would be diminished in the setting of poor patient tolerance or perception of benefit, regardless of the potential improvement or normalization of objective airflow parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient-reported outcome measures could be considered a more meaningful consideration compared with the objective measures of peak nasal flow or nasal resistance, particularly when considering a quality-of-life problem such as nasal valve compromise. However, currently available objective measures of nasal airflow have been shown to have poor correlation with patient perception of nasal airflow . The relative importance of the objective parameters would be diminished in the setting of poor patient tolerance or perception of benefit, regardless of the potential improvement or normalization of objective airflow parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%