2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02522-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical or bioprosthetic valves in the elderly: a 20-year comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the main advantage of bioprosthetic valves is the avoidance of anticoagulation; however, their durability is limited. Several trials showed that patient outcome after AVR is independent of the type of implanted prosthesis (mechanical versus biological) [22,23]. Significant differences are found only regarding the rate of major hemorrhage; these are more common in patients with mechanical valves: the incidence ranges from 1 to 2% per patient-year.…”
Section: Aortic Valve Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the main advantage of bioprosthetic valves is the avoidance of anticoagulation; however, their durability is limited. Several trials showed that patient outcome after AVR is independent of the type of implanted prosthesis (mechanical versus biological) [22,23]. Significant differences are found only regarding the rate of major hemorrhage; these are more common in patients with mechanical valves: the incidence ranges from 1 to 2% per patient-year.…”
Section: Aortic Valve Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…group of patients have been performed with an acceptable morbidity and mortality [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] . Long term clinical follow up of these patients has clearly demonstrated that bioprosthesis are the valve substitutes of choice in this group of patients 1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long term clinical follow up of these patients has clearly demonstrated that bioprosthesis are the valve substitutes of choice in this group of patients 1,[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] . However there is lack of information on patients from India undergoing bioprosthetic valve replacement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But all of them highlight the higher incidence of anticoagulant related haemorrhage in the mechanical valve group 2,4,5 . The incidence of thromboembolism, paravalvular leaks, infective endocarditis, structural dysfunction and valve related deaths were not significantly different in either group 4,5 . Avoidance of the risk of anticoagulant related haemorrhage is a major consideration apart from durability, in the choice of bioprosthesis in elderly 5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Our patient group comprises of predominantly economically backward individuals living in villages with no immediate access to such facilities. Avoiding anticoagulation is therefore 2,4 . But all of them highlight the higher incidence of anticoagulant related haemorrhage in the mechanical valve group 2,4,5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%