2022
DOI: 10.3390/polym14142892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Properties, Melting and Crystallization Behaviors, and Morphology of Carbon Nanotubes/Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyethylene Terephthalate Composites

Abstract: Carbon nanotube/continuous carbon fiber reinforced poly(ethylene terephthalate) (CNT/CCF/PET) composites are prepared by melt impregnating. The effects of CF and CNT content on the mechanical properties, melt and crystallization behaviors, and submicroscopic morphology of CNT/CCF/PET composites are studied. The tensile test results show that the increase of CF and the addition of appropriate amount of CNT improved the tensile strength and tensile modulus of the composites. When the content of CNT is 1.0 wt% an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher heat stability of USP compared to CC and USB is evident from its thermal behavior above 180°C, which can be attributed to the unfolding of the triple helix. Additionally, the T m value was influenced by the crystallinity of the material, with higher T m values corresponding to increased crystallinity (Qiao et al., 2022). Consistent with the XRD results displaying the highest crystallinity (6.05%) in USP, it exhibited the highest T m (202.56 ± 0.11°C), as expected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher heat stability of USP compared to CC and USB is evident from its thermal behavior above 180°C, which can be attributed to the unfolding of the triple helix. Additionally, the T m value was influenced by the crystallinity of the material, with higher T m values corresponding to increased crystallinity (Qiao et al., 2022). Consistent with the XRD results displaying the highest crystallinity (6.05%) in USP, it exhibited the highest T m (202.56 ± 0.11°C), as expected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(a) shows strong and sharp diffraction peaks, indicating the crystalline structure of the samples. The coated SiCp, however, showed sharper and narrower peaks than uncoated SiCp indicating better crystallinity [16], which usually corresponds to better mechanical properties when used as reinforcement [17]. Furthermore, the diffraction peaks at approximately 33.12, 35.08, 36.53, 39.03, 60.78, 66.67, and 72.67, can be indexed as ( 112), ( 212), ( 111), ( 200), ( 220), ( 311 SiCp was confirmed in the uncoated and coated composites respectively.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Composite Materials Xrd Of Uncoated ...mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Finally, the samples cooled to 20 °C were reheated to 200 °C at a constant rate of 10 °C/min to characterize the melting and crystallization behavior of the material. The crystallinity Xc was calculated, as shown in Equation (2) [ 43 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%