2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties of catalyst coated membranes for fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CCM structure were most likely formed due to stresses caused by the expansion of the membrane from its increased water uptake, 29,30 in combination with the CCM confinement within adjacent GDLs, flow field plates and seals. Both findings in terms of in situ membrane expansion and CCM undulation during fuel cell operation are significant and uniquely enabled by the present XCT technique, and cannot be readily detected through other means.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCM structure were most likely formed due to stresses caused by the expansion of the membrane from its increased water uptake, 29,30 in combination with the CCM confinement within adjacent GDLs, flow field plates and seals. Both findings in terms of in situ membrane expansion and CCM undulation during fuel cell operation are significant and uniquely enabled by the present XCT technique, and cannot be readily detected through other means.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,16 Furthermore, the CCM tensile and dynamic mechanical properties were found to be more sensitive to temperature than RH. 14,16 The confinement imposed to the membrane by the catalyst and diffusion layers was shown to prevent in-plane expansion/contraction, hence resulting in lower tensile peak stress when compared to the pure membrane, while the through-plane stress and strain were increased during hydration. 17 In order to evaluate the durability and diagnose potential mitigation strategies at reasonable cost and time, accelerated stress testing (AST) is generally applied via aggravating the chemical and mechanical stressors including current density, cell voltage, temperature, and RH fluctuations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical properties of CCM composites were comprehensively investigated by our group and compared to those of the corresponding PFSA membranes. [14][15][16][17] By conducting tensile stress-strain and dehydration tests under a wide range of temperature and RH conditions, Goulet et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Chemical degradation initiates the overall degradation processes 3,4 and further damages the membrane when combined with mechanical stress, strain, and fatigue induced by hygrothermal fluctuations in the MEA. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The resulting physical damage in the form of cracks and holes eventually causes hydrogen leaks across the membrane which is considered one of the main lifetime limiting failure modes in fuel cells. 4,[13][14][15][16] The primary chemical degradation in PEFCs is caused by reactions of reactive radicals with the PFSA ionomer membrane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%