2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Properties of Steel Fiber–Reinforced Self-Consolidating Controlled Low-Strength Material for Pavement Base Layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Less subsidence (<5% bleeding) Quick setting time (>0.1 MPa at 4 h) Easy to re-excavate-manually Twenty-eight-day compressive strength ≤ 1.0 MPa Since the 2000s, previous researchers have developed CLSMs using various waste materials/industrial byproducts (e.g., fly and bottom ashes, ground granulated blast furnace slag, waste foundry sand, cement kiln dust, steel slag, waterworks and paper sludges, waste rubber tires, and red mud) [7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. However, the application of these previously developed CLSMs to underground facility backfilling has been challenging due to three primary reasons: (a) previous CLSMs have relatively long durations for hardening; (b) poorer flowability than grout mortar; (c) large equipment is needed for the placement of CLSMs.…”
Section: General and Excavatable Backfilling (Void Filling)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less subsidence (<5% bleeding) Quick setting time (>0.1 MPa at 4 h) Easy to re-excavate-manually Twenty-eight-day compressive strength ≤ 1.0 MPa Since the 2000s, previous researchers have developed CLSMs using various waste materials/industrial byproducts (e.g., fly and bottom ashes, ground granulated blast furnace slag, waste foundry sand, cement kiln dust, steel slag, waterworks and paper sludges, waste rubber tires, and red mud) [7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. However, the application of these previously developed CLSMs to underground facility backfilling has been challenging due to three primary reasons: (a) previous CLSMs have relatively long durations for hardening; (b) poorer flowability than grout mortar; (c) large equipment is needed for the placement of CLSMs.…”
Section: General and Excavatable Backfilling (Void Filling)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, CLSM cures quickly, thus avoiding the need for long construction cycles [3]. Therefore, CLSM is a multifunctional backfilling material and can be useful for groove backfilling [4], ground heat exchangers [5], urban pipeline buffering [6], underground space backfilling [7] (such as goaf and abandoned underground tunnels), roadbed [8], abutment back [9], and erosion prevention slope filling [10]. CLSM is eco-friendly, low-budget, and low labor intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in China's engineering practice in recent years, the research and application of flowable fills using Portland cement as a curing agent and waste soils as raw materials are very common. In engineering practice in the United States, flowable fills based on fly ash and/or sand aggregates are used in a wide range of applications [4,5]. This is mainly due to factors such as the costs of materials in each region, the types of waste output, the type of technology adopted, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%