Advances in Steel Structures (ICASS '02) 2002
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044017-0/50129-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties of structural steel at elevated temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, their results were not used in this comparison. Outinen [4] provided reduction factors for 2 mm S350GD+Z (minimum yield strength of 350 MPa) steels, while Chen and Young [6] gave the factors for 1 mm G550 steels. Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With Available Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, their results were not used in this comparison. Outinen [4] provided reduction factors for 2 mm S350GD+Z (minimum yield strength of 350 MPa) steels, while Chen and Young [6] gave the factors for 1 mm G550 steels. Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With Available Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the steady-state test method was used to determine the mechanical properties of light gauge cold-formed steels due to its simplicity and accurate data acquisition. Many other researchers have also used the steady-state test method for the same reasons [4,9]. Outinen [4] and Lee et al [5] carried out both steady-state and transient-state tests of cold-formed steels and showed that the difference between steady-state and transient-state test results was negligible.…”
Section: Test Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to its simplicity and accurate data acquisition, many other researchers have also used the steady-state test method [7][8][9][10] . Outinen 7 and Lee et al 9 carried out both steady-state and transient-state tests of cold-formed steels and showed that the difference between steady-state and transient-state test results was negligible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%