2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties of the spinal cord and brain: Comparison with clinical-grade biomaterials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Comparisons between the frequency response corresponding to the 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-order Prony series. G 1 is the storage modulus, G 2 is the loss modulus, |G * | is the amplitude of G * (iw) , and is the phase angle Our results are consistent with the dynamic compressive mechanical test, where the frequency response was observable only in a frequency range larger than 30 Hz [45]. This also implies that the dynamic response of viscoelastic materials can be predicted using a ramp-hold indentation test.…”
Section: Phantom Testsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…6 Comparisons between the frequency response corresponding to the 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-order Prony series. G 1 is the storage modulus, G 2 is the loss modulus, |G * | is the amplitude of G * (iw) , and is the phase angle Our results are consistent with the dynamic compressive mechanical test, where the frequency response was observable only in a frequency range larger than 30 Hz [45]. This also implies that the dynamic response of viscoelastic materials can be predicted using a ramp-hold indentation test.…”
Section: Phantom Testsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This approach has been previously used to test many biological and synthetical materials. 2 , 4 , 23 The brain specimens were placed in the sample container; force and displacement values were adjusted to be a zero. Prior to the data collection procedure, an upper flat indenter was lowered onto the specimen until a preload of 10 mN was observed using the WinTest DMA software (Bose Corporation, ElectroForce Systems Group, Minnesota, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) has been considered as an effective technique for measuring the bulk mechanical properties of viscoelastic materials. 4 This method is flexible and powerful to map frequency-dependent viscoelastic properties of biological tissue over a range of frequencies covering physiological and injury loading conditions. The storage modulus in viscoelastic materials characterizes the ability of the material to store energy in the elastic phase and the loss modulus characterizes the ability of the material to dissipate energy, for instance as heat, in the viscous phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural and compositional heterogeneity, alongside hierarchical patterning, is responsible for guiding cellular processes and dynamic non-linear mechanical behaviour of living tissue [32,65]. Hydrogels are an ideal biomaterial for CNS modelling due to their high water content and porous structure enabling diffusion of metabolites, with the solid-phase polymer network providing relevant mechanical and spatial cues, tuneable mechanics and versatile chemical modification [17,34,[65][66][67].…”
Section: Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of mechanical control of cell behaviour becomes increasingly relevant when we observe abnormal mechanical features (i.e. increased stiffness) in neurodevelopmental disorders, neurodegenerative disease and CNS injury [ 28 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%