2019
DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical respiratory support in cardiogenic shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One poorly researched aspect of patient care in CS is the management of respiratory support, despite the intimate cardiopulmonary relationship between positive pressure ventilation and ventricular function [ 33 , 34 ]. We, therefore, set out to investigate to what extent cDPP3 is associated with the need for mechanical ventilation and short-term outcomes in a CS patient population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One poorly researched aspect of patient care in CS is the management of respiratory support, despite the intimate cardiopulmonary relationship between positive pressure ventilation and ventricular function [ 33 , 34 ]. We, therefore, set out to investigate to what extent cDPP3 is associated with the need for mechanical ventilation and short-term outcomes in a CS patient population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the effects of MV in improving hemodynamics by unloading the left ventricle, improving oxygenation and tissue perfusion, may play a beneficial role in CS, particularly when initiated early in the clinical course. However, despite the significant interactions with the cardiovascular system and pervasiveness in CS, the ideal management of respiratory failure, understanding of the risk factors, and the development of associated clinical outcomes or complications have to date not been adequately investigated [9,10]. Given the paucity of available data, we sought to explore the association between MV timing and strategy among patients with CS from the CULPRIT-SHOCK (Culprit Lesion Only PCI versus Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock) randomized clinical trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%