2007
DOI: 10.1177/0021998307074132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Response of Al Matrix Syntactic Foams Produced by Pressure Infiltration Casting

Abstract: Aluminum matrix syntactic foams with low-cost porous ceramic spheres of diameters between 0.25 and 4 mm have been manufactured by pressure infiltration casting. These syntactic foams were homogeneous in structure and had densities as low as half of the density of the Al matrix. The mechanical response of the four types of syntactic foams with different sphere sizes and densities under static and dynamic conditions have been investigated. The plateau strength and thus the amount of energy absorption of the synt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The two materials show a similar performance but the syntactic foams are marginally less attractive for lightweight panels owing to their high density. [1][2][3][4][5][12][13][14][15] The energy absorbed is higher per unit volume or mass than for the equivalent porous metal, but much lower than for "conventional" syntactic foams. The much-reduced load drop in the foams presented in this study means that they show high energy absorption efficiencies (85-90%) that are more typical of metal foams and porous metals than "conventional" syntactic foams.…”
Section: Figure 2 Force Required To Eject Castings From the Mould As mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two materials show a similar performance but the syntactic foams are marginally less attractive for lightweight panels owing to their high density. [1][2][3][4][5][12][13][14][15] The energy absorbed is higher per unit volume or mass than for the equivalent porous metal, but much lower than for "conventional" syntactic foams. The much-reduced load drop in the foams presented in this study means that they show high energy absorption efficiencies (85-90%) that are more typical of metal foams and porous metals than "conventional" syntactic foams.…”
Section: Figure 2 Force Required To Eject Castings From the Mould As mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[1][2][3] Figure 1 presents a schematic stress -strain curve for an ideal energy absorber, [4] with the key characteristic being the flat plateau which can extend to strains in excess of 50%. Figure 1 also shows a typical stress -strain response for a syntactic Al foam where it is apparent that beyond the elastic limit there is a large load drop, [5] which is more pronounced for smaller, stronger hollow spheres, and which it is believed to mark the onset of damage to the spheres and consequent reduction in their load bearing capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Zhao investigated the mechanical response of four types of Al based MMSF with different sphere sizes and densities under static and dynamic conditions. The plateau strength and the energy absorption of the MMSFs were largely determined by the volume fraction of Al and to a lesser extent by the properties of the ceramic spheres [45]. Although the most common matrix materials are Al and steel, other perspective matrices, such as Mg [46][47][48][49][50], Zn [51,52] and Ti [53,54] alloys were also studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The threshold pressure can be calculated (estimated) [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] or measured [29][30][31]. Pressure infiltration is capable of producing MMSFs with maximal (~64 vol%) hollow sphere volume fraction and better matrix dispersion, but it requires more investment and more sophisticated equipment [29,30,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. In practice, usually one kind of hollow sphere set with monomodal diameter distribution is applied as reinforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Zhao [36] investigated the mechanical response of ASFs with low-cost porous ceramic hollow spheres under static and dynamic conditions. The plateau strength and the absorbed energy were largely determined by the volume fraction of Al and to a lesser extent by the properties of the hollow spheres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%