2021
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.104.014901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical response of packings of nonspherical particles: A case study of two-dimensional packings of circulo-lines

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in anisotropic materials, it is important to track all Ĉ elements to fully characterize their mechanical properties. In this Appendix, we verify that the pressuredependence of the single-cell shear modulus is related to the variation of the packing fraction at jamming onset φ J with simple shear strain γ as shown in previous studies [37]. We illustrate this relationship using a single cell containing the N = 2 monodisperse disk packing with fixed-length walls in the inset to Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, in anisotropic materials, it is important to track all Ĉ elements to fully characterize their mechanical properties. In this Appendix, we verify that the pressuredependence of the single-cell shear modulus is related to the variation of the packing fraction at jamming onset φ J with simple shear strain γ as shown in previous studies [37]. We illustrate this relationship using a single cell containing the N = 2 monodisperse disk packing with fixed-length walls in the inset to Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As we showed previously for jammed packings of spherical particles with periodic boundary conditions, we find quite generally that G c (θ) varies linearly with p [15,37], G c (θ) = G c0 (θ)+λ c (θ)p, for disk-filled cells with periodic boundary conditions and physical walls in the absence of particle rearrangements (see the inset to Fig. 4 (a)).…”
Section: B Shear Modulus Versus Pressure For a Single Cellsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, in all cases studied for which jammed particle packings (with repulsive linear spring interactions) possess quartic eigenmodes of the dynamical matrix, the power-law scaling exponent β > 0.5. For example, β ≈ 0.75 for 2D and 3D jammed packings of completely deformable particles [32], β ≈ 1.0 for 2D jammed packings of ellipse-shaped particles, and β ≈ 0.8-0.9 for 2D jammed packings of circulo-lines [55]. We encourage future studies to understand the link between quartic eigenmodes of the dynamical matrix and the non-trivial power-law scaling of G(P ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We find that G 0 decreases as A approaches unity (because of the decrease in z J as A → 1), but the power-law scaling exponents α ≈ 1 and β ≈ 0.75 (shown in the insets) are insensitive to A. Note that the power-law scaling exponent β is different for jammed packings of completely deformable particles compared to that for rigid spherical frictionless and frictional particles (β ≈ 0.5), as well as rigid, frictionless ellipse-(1.0) [23] and circulo-line-shaped particles (0.8-0.9) [55]. The larger values of β > 0.5 is correlated with the presence of quartic eigenmodes of the dynamical matrix.…”
Section: E Ensemble-averaged Shear Modulusmentioning
confidence: 97%