2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020jb020586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Response of Shallow Crust to Groundwater Storage Variations: Inferences From Deformation and Seismic Observations in the Eastern Southern Alps, Italy

Abstract: Constant redistribution of surface loads due to continental hydrology (van Dam et al., 2001) causes measurable deformation of the Earth's surface. In particular, seasonal hydrological mass movements turned out to influence tectonic deformation of the lithosphere and modulate seismicity rates in several tectonic environments (e.g.,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The color scale shows the number of points used for the linear regression, a measure of the stability of the results (the hotter the color, the more reliable the δv / v value, see supplementary material). For comparison, we plot the groundwater storage (GWS) variations for this area (Pintori et al., 2021) and the strain response obtained from geodetic observations (Serpelloni et al., 2018). The seismic results show a sign‐reversed resemblance to both strain and GWS variations revealing an anticorrelation relation, and thus making the fluid‐content variations within the karstic aquifer to be responsible for the observed seismic‐velocity perturbations.…”
Section: Network Response Of the Relative Seismic‐velocity Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The color scale shows the number of points used for the linear regression, a measure of the stability of the results (the hotter the color, the more reliable the δv / v value, see supplementary material). For comparison, we plot the groundwater storage (GWS) variations for this area (Pintori et al., 2021) and the strain response obtained from geodetic observations (Serpelloni et al., 2018). The seismic results show a sign‐reversed resemblance to both strain and GWS variations revealing an anticorrelation relation, and thus making the fluid‐content variations within the karstic aquifer to be responsible for the observed seismic‐velocity perturbations.…”
Section: Network Response Of the Relative Seismic‐velocity Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is part of the prealpine belt in the Italian Southeastern Alps (Figure 1), located at the convergence between the Adriatic and Eurasian plates (Serpelloni et al., 2016). This area has already been the subject for tectonic deformation (Anderlini et al., 2020), hydrological cycle (Filippini et al., 2018; Grillo et al., 2019; Pintori et al., 2021), and seismicity studies (Anselmi et al., 2011; Chiaraluce et al., 2009; Danesi et al., 2015). The map in Figure 1 shows the location of the major thrusts and fissured‐karst aquifers (Bundesanstalt für Geowiβenschaften und Rohstoffe, 1970) in the study area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, important observations are available just for the last few decades (e.g., values of geodetic deformation from GNSS or gravity data from GRACE) and are still insufficient to investigate on the systematic connection between precipitation and the rare occurrence of serious earthquakes. Nevertheless Pintori et al (2021) have carried out an important research of this type for the central sector of the study area, analyzing the relationship between precipitation and minor seismicity in the time period 2010-2019. The present study adopted a complementary approach and looked at major seismicity in a long time period using solely statistical methods (no physical modeling).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that in absence of other stress perturbation sources, the regional release of background seismicity is predominantly influenced by the regional tectonic stress field; in such a context, it can be expected that a steady stress field should tend to generate background seismicity with stationary rates; however, if other natural (e.g., hydrogeology: see Hainzl et al, 2006;Pintori et al, 2021) or man-made (e.g., pressurized fluid injections: see Shapiro et al, 2007;Garcia-Aristizabal, 2018) processes are able to perturb the local stress field, then it is possible that the rate at which seismicity is released in that specific area can be altered. In such a case, slight deviations from stationarity could possibly be measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%