2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2005.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical response of wooden boards subjected to humidity step variations: climatic chamber measurements and fitted mathematical models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 and 8, it can be confirmed that the horizontal displacements (recorded by LVDT 2, 6) follow a similar trend as that recorded by the horizontal strain gauges. The final displacements measured across an individual oak wooden board (as obtained by LVDT 2, 6) are comparable to those following from multiplying the local values measured by strain gauges at similar locations (i.e., SG 6,19) with the corresponding nominal LVDT width. The relative differences between these global and local deformation measures for the two mock-ups fall in between 3 and 35%, and indicate that the deformation across a board is not ideally uniform, due to the heterogeneity of the oak wood microstructure.…”
Section: Deformation Responsesupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 and 8, it can be confirmed that the horizontal displacements (recorded by LVDT 2, 6) follow a similar trend as that recorded by the horizontal strain gauges. The final displacements measured across an individual oak wooden board (as obtained by LVDT 2, 6) are comparable to those following from multiplying the local values measured by strain gauges at similar locations (i.e., SG 6,19) with the corresponding nominal LVDT width. The relative differences between these global and local deformation measures for the two mock-ups fall in between 3 and 35%, and indicate that the deformation across a board is not ideally uniform, due to the heterogeneity of the oak wood microstructure.…”
Section: Deformation Responsesupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In [16][17][18], experimental tests were combined with numerical modelling to characterize the fatigue behaviour of mock-ups of single board panel paintings under sinusoidal, relative humidity fluctuations. In [19] mock-ups of panel paintings were subjected to step variations of the ambient relative humidity, in order to obtain detailed insight into their hygro-mechanical response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical and dimensional response of wood to changes in RH have been studied extensively, both experimentally (Chomcharn and Skaar 1983;Schellen 2002;Bratasz et al 2010;Senni et al 2010;Caré et al 2012;Derome et al 2012;Gauvin et al 2014;Lanvermann, Wittel, and Niemz 2014) and numerically (Gloimüller et al 2012;Rafsanjani et al 2012;Saft and Kaliske 2013). Also, the consequences of unilateral exposure of a wooden board to a step change in RH have been studied for kiln-drying (Brandao and Perré 1996;Allegretti, Rémond, and Perré 2003;Allegretti and Ferrari 2007;Uetimane Junior et al 2010;Rémond et al 2013) and in a panel painting (Dionisi Vici, Mazzanti, and Uzielli 2006). Whereas the implications for panel paintings exposed to a sinusoidally fluctuating environment have been studied numerically (Rachwal et al 2012a(Rachwal et al , 2012b, experimental studies are scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DK is mounted at the backside of the panel painting and monitors the behaviour of the panel as a whole. The same research group also developed a monitoring cross beam (MCB) that measures cupping, swelling and shrinking, and constraint forces [19]. Strain measurements on wood are also performed with fibre Bragg grating sensors [13,20,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%