2015
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2015.1006207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical responses of the periodontal ligament based on an exponential hyperelastic model: a combined experimental and finite element method

Abstract: The V-W exponential hyperelastic model is adopted to describe the instantaneous elastic response of the periodontal ligament (PDL). The general theoretical framework of constitutive modeling is described based on nonlinear continuum mechanics, and the elasticity tensor used to develop UMAT subroutine is formulated. Nanoindentation experiment is performed to characterize mechanical properties of an adult pig PDL specimen. Then the experiment is simulated by using the finite element (FE) analysis. Meanwhile, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper strain of 2.4% was baseless, and whether the strain of 2.4% may be related to root resorption would require further studies, although it was related to the tooth movement rate. In addition, the PDL was assumed to be an inaccurate linear elastic material in their simulation, which also affected the accuracy of their results (Huang et al, 2016; Anneke et al, 2017). On the other hand, Liao et al (2016) just considered the PDL stress but ignored the strain, and as a result, the optimal forces of the canine distal translation and tipping were 35-100 and 14-50 g, respectively, as defined by local hydrostatic pressure, and 76-266 and 37-135 g as defined by volumeaveraged hydrostatic stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper strain of 2.4% was baseless, and whether the strain of 2.4% may be related to root resorption would require further studies, although it was related to the tooth movement rate. In addition, the PDL was assumed to be an inaccurate linear elastic material in their simulation, which also affected the accuracy of their results (Huang et al, 2016; Anneke et al, 2017). On the other hand, Liao et al (2016) just considered the PDL stress but ignored the strain, and as a result, the optimal forces of the canine distal translation and tipping were 35-100 and 14-50 g, respectively, as defined by local hydrostatic pressure, and 76-266 and 37-135 g as defined by volumeaveraged hydrostatic stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where l i are the deviatoric principal stretches obtained from the principal stretches, J 1I is the elastic volume strain, and m i , a i and D i are the parameters used in such a hyperelastic model [35]. The hyperelastic constitutive model was also proposed to fit PDL's viscoelastic behaviour [34], and has been adopted widely in dental biomechanics [11,36]. Its accuracy had also been validated [34] by correlating with the previous in vitro studies on PDLs of human cadavers [37] as well as other mathematical models [37,38].…”
Section: Finite-element Modelling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for simplicity, and utility on finite element analysis, many authors have capitulated to the assumption and focused on finding the most suitable elastic modulus values of periodontal ligament as a homogenous, isotropic, and linear elastic material 3 , 6 , 16 , 24 , 25 . However, recent authors have regarded the periodontal ligament as a non-linear, hyperelastic material, and have found variable elastic modulus values for periodontal ligament 13 . The influence of periodontal ligament as a non-linear hyperelastic material should be considered in further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%