1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90552-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1990). Recent studies have recommended that it be used with a bonding agent to enhance its stability in severely compromised endodontically treated teeth (Eakle et al . 1994, Triolo et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1990). Recent studies have recommended that it be used with a bonding agent to enhance its stability in severely compromised endodontically treated teeth (Eakle et al . 1994, Triolo et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 24 hours all 30 specimens were subjected to manual thermal cycling of 100 cycles at 55+2 ºC and 4+2 ºC. (12,13)…”
Section: Group III and Group Vimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After one week of storage in distilled water at room temperature, (12) the bond strength between composite and tooth structure was measured in shear mode by using universal compression machine (Electric Unconfined Compression Apparatus, Soit Test Co Inc, USA), at a cross head speed of 0.5mm/ min. (13) The mode of failure was tested by using visual examination and a magnifying lens for all specimens.…”
Section: Figure (4): Four Pins Seated In Placementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As características de manipulação das ligas de gálio lembram as do amálgama de prata por serem trituradas, condensadas, esculpidas e polidas de forma muito semelhante 10,16,25 . Em testes laboratoriais, a liga de gálio apresentou resistência à compressão e à tração diametral 1,5 , microinfiltração 7 e retenção mecânica em cavidades 6 semelhantes às do amálgama. Entretanto, o valor de "creep" 5 , o limite de fadiga 26 , e a resistência ao cisalhamento 21 foram maiores para as ligas de gálio.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified