2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical stability of individual austenite grains in TRIP steel studied by synchrotron X-ray diffraction during tensile loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also already been shown in previous works that the transformation stability of RA is affected by many factors, among other its morphology [38,39]. The largest "blocky type" austenite grains usually show a relatively low mechanical stability during tensile testing [40,41]. This morphology tends to transform to martensite under a small strain and contributes little to the TRIP effect [8,38,42,43], as it is 'consumed' during the early stage of plastic deformation [9,44].…”
Section: Microstructure Of the Qandp Processed Steels Before Cyclic Defmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has also already been shown in previous works that the transformation stability of RA is affected by many factors, among other its morphology [38,39]. The largest "blocky type" austenite grains usually show a relatively low mechanical stability during tensile testing [40,41]. This morphology tends to transform to martensite under a small strain and contributes little to the TRIP effect [8,38,42,43], as it is 'consumed' during the early stage of plastic deformation [9,44].…”
Section: Microstructure Of the Qandp Processed Steels Before Cyclic Defmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It should be noted that Q&P processing leads to formation of a very complex multi-phase microstructure, where there are numerous other factors affecting transformation stability of RA, such as the carbon concentration in the RA grains [25,41], the constraining effect of the surrounding phases [54], etc. The stability of a given RA grain is always determined by interplay of all those factors, and it is an extremely complicated task to determine the contribution of each individual factor [44].…”
Section: Effect Of Crystallographic Orientation Of Ra On Its Stabilitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, similar behaviour has also been reported (De Diego-Calderón et al, 2014;De Knijf et al, 2014a) in Q&P steels. It has also been already shown in literature that transformation stability of austenite is affected by many factors, among others the carbon concentration in the austenite grains (van Dijk et al, 2005;Blondé et al, 2014), its grain size (Jimenez-Melero et al, 2007), the constraining effect of the surrounding phases (Jacques et al, 2001a) and its morphology (Xiong et al, 2013). In our case, carbon content, grain size and the surrounding phases of RA (fractions of TM and UM) are very similar for the 224-350-500, 244-350-500 and 264-350-500 samples.…”
Section: Influence Of Qtmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The higher stability of HT2I steel could be attributed, among other factors, to a more efficient carbon partitioning from bainite to austenite and, therefore, carbon enrichment of RA during the isothermal holding at the BIT stage . Moreover, the larger RA particles of HT3I steel along with the higher M s σ temperature may explain the reduced mechanical stability against transformation compared with HT2I steel, since the stability of RA is controlled not only by the local carbon level but also by the RA grain size . In the investigation, the morphology of RA has been taken into account by examination of the RA‐grain aspect ratio.…”
Section: Mechanical Behavior and Ra Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%