2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Strength of Four Different Biceps Tenodesis Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
86
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
86
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Biceps tenodesis is suggested in young, active patients that present with a degeneration of less than 50% of the biceps tendon fibres, medial subluxation of the biceps tendon, combined subscapularis tears and biceps subluxation or nonreparable SLAP lesions [16,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biceps tenodesis is suggested in young, active patients that present with a degeneration of less than 50% of the biceps tendon fibres, medial subluxation of the biceps tendon, combined subscapularis tears and biceps subluxation or nonreparable SLAP lesions [16,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanical analysis has established interference screw fixation as stronger than soft tissue tenodesis [2,18]. Since the original description of Gartsman and Hammerman [12] of an onlay technique with Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Prior publications have advocated performing the tenodesis 1 cm proximal to the musculotendinous junction to a location 1 cm proximal to the distal extent of the pectoralis major on the humerus, 3,5 which has recently been reaffirmed by cadaveric research. 6 Biomechanical studies suggest that biotenodesis screws provide stronger fixation compared with suture anchors in cadaveric models, [8][9][10] but in vivo studies have not shown a clinical difference in implant types 4 and failures of the biotenodesis screw have been reported. 11,12 The Mitek Lupine anchor is an absorbable implant composed of poly(lactide-coglycolide) polymer and tricalcium phosphate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Multiple surgical options for LHB tenodesis have previously been reported, studied, and compared, with innumerable variations related to the tenodesis location (proximal v distal to bicipital groove), surgical approach (arthroscopic v open), and surgical implants used. [1][2][3][4][5][8][9][10][11] In this article we describe and demonstrate a surgical technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a single double-loaded Mitek Lupine suture anchor (DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA) ( Table 1, Video 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%