“…In our study, the overall rate of successful reperfusion (79.9%) is within the range of core-lab controlled results (58.7-88%) [18,19,20,21,22], yet lower than that in self-reported series with reperfusion rates up to 91% [2,3,13,15,16,24,25,26,27]. One putative explanation might be the blinded regrading of all digital subtraction angiography images according to the Cerebral Angiographic Revascularization Grading standards, thereby ensuring common operator-independent grading standards over time.…”