2013
DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0b013e31828a89a2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Ventilation Strategies in Children With Acute Lung Injury

Abstract: Although in theory, many pediatric intensivists agreed with adult recommendations to ventilate with lower tidal volumes and pressure limits, the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Mechanical Ventilation data revealed that over 25% of pediatric patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome at many of these practice sites were ventilated with tidal volumes above 10 mL/kg and that high positive inspiratory pressure levels (> 35 mm Hg) were often tolerated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
38
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This reflects the mode with which most pediatric intensivists are traditionally comfortable with (22, 24). This utility of this mode, however, steadily declined as the disease progressed and other modes of ventilation were adopted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This reflects the mode with which most pediatric intensivists are traditionally comfortable with (22, 24). This utility of this mode, however, steadily declined as the disease progressed and other modes of ventilation were adopted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, 71% and 96% of patients had V T < 8 and 10 mL/kg, respectively. However, it is difficult to find PIP and V T above these levels in modern pediatric ARDS (9, 32). Finally, as ventilation was not protocolized, lack of association between pressure and outcome may be confounded by clinician management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Berlin definition requires a minimum PEEP of 5 cm H 2 O, other ventilator manipulations and the practice patterns around PEEP management can also alter this ratio. Consequently, differences in clinical practice may influence the diagnosis, particularly in the PICU where there is greater variability in ventilator management relative to adult ICUs (8, 9). This has led some pediatric practitioners to adopt the oxygenation index (OI) ([Fio 2 × mean airway pressure (Paw) × 100]/Pao 2 ) and oxygen saturation index (OSI) ([Fio 2 × Paw × 100]/Spo 2 ) to assess hypoxemia in children (10, 11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%