1970
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(70)80018-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanics and mass transfer of single bubbles in free rise through some Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
41
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Calderbank (1967) argue that the eccentricity decreases with increasing viscosity accompanied by the appearance of "tails" behind small bubbles and of spherical indentations in the rear surfaces. Calderbank et al (1970) developed a new theory for mass transfer in the bubble wake. Their work with aqueous solutions of glycerol covers the bubble size range 0.2-6.0×10 -2 m and includes the various bubble shapes as determined by the bubble size and the viscosity of the Newtonian liquid.…”
Section: Effect Of Bubble Shape On Mass Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Calderbank (1967) argue that the eccentricity decreases with increasing viscosity accompanied by the appearance of "tails" behind small bubbles and of spherical indentations in the rear surfaces. Calderbank et al (1970) developed a new theory for mass transfer in the bubble wake. Their work with aqueous solutions of glycerol covers the bubble size range 0.2-6.0×10 -2 m and includes the various bubble shapes as determined by the bubble size and the viscosity of the Newtonian liquid.…”
Section: Effect Of Bubble Shape On Mass Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Astarita and Apuzzo (1965) presented experimental results on the rising velocity and shapes of bubbles in both purely viscous and viscoeleastic non-Newtonian pseudoplastic liquids. According to Calderbank et al (1970) bubble shapes observed in distilled water vary from spherical to oblate spheroidal (0.42-1.81×10 -2 m) to spherical cap (1.81-3.79×10 -2 m) with increasing bubble size. Over the size range (4.2-70×10 -3 m) the bubbles rise with a zigzag or spiral motion and between bubble diameters of 7×10 -3 m (Re=1800) and 18×10 -3 m (Re=5900) an irregular ellipsoid shape is adopted and the bubble pulsates about its mean shape.…”
Section: Effect Of Bubble Shape On Mass Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations