2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.6934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism and Kinetics of Hexamethyldisilazane Reaction with a Fumed Silica Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preparation of modified silicas and their structural and adsorptive properties were described in details elsewhere [35][36][37][38][39]. Choice of modified fumed silica is caused by a weaker effect of confined space between primary particles in their aggregates and between these aggregates in agglomerates in comparison with porous adsorbents [30,31,[35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preparation of modified silicas and their structural and adsorptive properties were described in details elsewhere [35][36][37][38][39]. Choice of modified fumed silica is caused by a weaker effect of confined space between primary particles in their aggregates and between these aggregates in agglomerates in comparison with porous adsorbents [30,31,[35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetic studies and quantum chemical calculations have revealed the electrophilic substitution mechanism and second-order reaction kinetics for the reaction of HMDS with surface hydroxyl groups [17,18]. Consequently, in a highly reproducible process, HMDS transforms the hydrophilic substrate surface into a hydrophobic one by removing adhered water and reacting with surface bound hydroxyl groups which affect the photoresist adhesion [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a shift seems rather important to us, since it leads to a decrease in the hydrogen bond energy by 5 kJ according to the E. D. Sokolov formula [11] Dn/n 0 = E·1.6·10 -2 (kcal), where n 0 = 3600 cm -1 , E is the energy. On the sample additionally modified by HMDS, the concentration of the most active adsorption sites decreases by a factor of 4 relative to the sample Silokhrom-80 + PEHS (4.8·10 -2 and 1.1·10 -2 OH/nm 2 respectively), which is connected with their blocking by -Si(CH 3 ) 3 radicals and partially by NH 3 molecules formed when the HMDS molecules decompose [12,13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%