Transition metal-catalyzed [4 + 2 + 1] cycloaddition
of in situ generated ene/yne–ene–allenes
(from
ene/yne–ene propargyl esters) and carbon monoxide (CO) gives
the [4 + 2 + 1] cycloadducts rather than [2 + 2 + 1] cycloadducts.
Investigating the mechanism of this [4 + 2 + 1] reaction and understanding
why the [2 + 2 + 1] reaction does not compete and the role of the
allene moiety in the substrates are important. This is also helpful
to guide the future design of new [4 + 2 + 1] cycloadditions. Reported
here are the kinetic and computed studies of the [4 + 2 + 1] reactions
of ene–ene propargyl esters and CO. A quantum chemical study
(at the DLPNO-CCSD(T)//BMK level) revealed that the [4 + 2 + 1] reaction
includes four key steps, which are 1,3-acyloxy migration (rate-determining
step), oxidative cyclization, CO migratory insertion, and reductive
elimination. The allene moiety in the substrates is critical for providing
additional coordination to the rhodium center in the final step of
the catalytic cycle, which in turn favors the reductive elimination
transition state in the [4 + 2 + 1] rather than in the [2 + 2 + 1]
pathway. The CO insertion step in the [4 + 2 + 1] reaction, which
could occur through either the UP (favored here) or DOWN CO insertion
pathway, has also been deeply scrutinized, and some guidance from
this analysis has been provided to help the future design of new [4
+ 2 + 1] reactions. Quantum chemical calculations have also been applied
to explain why [4 + 2] and [4 + 1] cycloadditions do not happen and
how trienes as side products for some substrates are generated.