2007
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2007.070410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism-based resource allocation for multimedia transmission over spectrum agile wireless networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These auctions result in truth-telling equilibria while enabling spectrum reuse to improve spectrum utilization. In (Fattahi, Fu, Van Der Schaar & Paganini 2007), a spectrum allocation mechanism for multimedia transmission is presented. In this work users' and system performance are quantified when wireless stations employ different cross-layer strategies, and they are compared with optimal global performance.…”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These auctions result in truth-telling equilibria while enabling spectrum reuse to improve spectrum utilization. In (Fattahi, Fu, Van Der Schaar & Paganini 2007), a spectrum allocation mechanism for multimedia transmission is presented. In this work users' and system performance are quantified when wireless stations employ different cross-layer strategies, and they are compared with optimal global performance.…”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important QoS issue has been considered in [14,28,52,56]. The focus of these papers are on metrics such as throughput and delay.…”
Section: Related Work 251 Cognitive Radio Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of these papers are on metrics such as throughput and delay. Fattahi et al [14] propose a game theoretic approach for the problem of resource allocation for multimedia transmission in spectrum-agile wireless networks, where each station plays a resource management game coordinated by a network moderator. In [56], a cognitive MAC protocol is proposed to establish a CR adhoc network.…”
Section: Related Work 251 Cognitive Radio Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), taking into account both its node characteristics and traffic demand (i.e., traffic type, maximum acceptable delay, jitter, etc.). However, a selfish node could choose not to conform to this rule and request more resources than it really needs [11]. Motivated either by greed or fear of problems in case of sudden QoS degradation, a node may choose to lie (over-claim), particularly if no cost is associated with resource requests (/reservations).…”
Section: Spectrum Needs Over-reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, efforts have been made to limit the benefits of non-conformant behavior. The proposed mechanisms are based on reputation schemes [9], tit-for-tat models [10], punish/reward schemes or transfer models [11], where some kind of compensation is offered in return for using a spectrum portion. Still, an important assumption is the existence of a mechanism for effective detection of nonconformant operation and identification of misbehaving nodes (and even malicious intent).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%