Volume 8A: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering 2018
DOI: 10.1115/imece2018-87991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism Interaction During Droplet Evaporation on Nanostructured Hydrophilic Surfaces

Abstract: Recent studies of droplet spreading on nanostructured surfaces have demonstrated that the fluid motion and wicking effects impact the morphology of the liquid on the nanostructured surface and the thermophysics of the vaporization process. In the investigation summarized here, models of the spreading mechanism, and mechanisms of heat transport to the interface of a spreading droplet are used to explore the interaction of these mechanisms during the droplet vaporization process on nanostructured hydrophilic sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of the fast velocity of the bubble released by the nucleation sites and the liquid capillary pumping can prevent the formation of a stable continuous vapor layer. The occurrence of evaporation regime on the NW surface at higher superheat (as shown in Figures S16 and S17) could be explained by the delay of the onset of nucleate boiling on nanostructured hydrophilic surfaces (as reported by Van Carey et al (2018)). Indeed, nanocavities require larger superheat to be activated as shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…A combination of the fast velocity of the bubble released by the nucleation sites and the liquid capillary pumping can prevent the formation of a stable continuous vapor layer. The occurrence of evaporation regime on the NW surface at higher superheat (as shown in Figures S16 and S17) could be explained by the delay of the onset of nucleate boiling on nanostructured hydrophilic surfaces (as reported by Van Carey et al (2018)). Indeed, nanocavities require larger superheat to be activated as shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…According to Fourier’s law, the temperature drop across the layer was calculated as the layer thickness multiplied by the heat flux, divided by the thermal conductivity where q ″ is the heat flux, k is the thermal conductivity, d T is the temperature drop, and d x is the layer thickness. Temperature drop increases with heat flux, therefore 200 W/cm 2 , previously determined to be the critical heat flux of the nanostructured surface was used to calculate the temperature drop across the ZnO coating and also the mineral deposition layer. The nanoporous layer was approximated as a 5 μm thick solid ZnO layer with thermal conductivity of 23.399 W/mK .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nanoporous nature of the surface coating caused the surface to have extremely low contact angles and enhanced rewetting of dry areas. 19,20 Droplet evaporation on the nanostructured surface was found to provide higher heat fluxes than evaporation on a plain copper surface at all superheats with a CHF twice as high as the uncoated copper. 20 Although not the focus of this durability study, similar ZnO nanopillars have also been shown to have desirable antimicrobial characteristics which would prevent biofouling in potential heat exchangers.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation