1983
DOI: 10.1177/00220345830620061001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of Action of an Antiseptic, Anti-odor Mouthwash

Abstract: Inter-related determinants of oral malodor were measured over a three-hour period in 30 human subjects after mouthwash treatments. Re-odoration was important to mouthwash activity for 30 min. At post-treatment times of 60-180 min, the anti-odor activity of the product is due solely to its anti-microbial action.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
11

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
49
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis activity has been demonstrated in several studies [for details see a meta-analysis published by Gunsolley 52 (2006)]. An EO mouthrinse was able to reduce the offensive gases present in morning bad breath as measured by a sulfide monitor, 50 a result that is in agreement with those of a previous short-term study, 53 in which the results indicated a reduction of the organoleptic scores by EOs, which caused a sustained reduction in the plaque odorigenic bacteria, unlike the placebo. An argument was made that the re-odoration was important to the overall activity of the product only for about 30 min after treatment and, at post-treatment times of 60-180 min, the anti-odor activity of the product was due to its anti-microbial action.…”
Section: Essential Oilssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Anti-plaque and anti-gingivitis activity has been demonstrated in several studies [for details see a meta-analysis published by Gunsolley 52 (2006)]. An EO mouthrinse was able to reduce the offensive gases present in morning bad breath as measured by a sulfide monitor, 50 a result that is in agreement with those of a previous short-term study, 53 in which the results indicated a reduction of the organoleptic scores by EOs, which caused a sustained reduction in the plaque odorigenic bacteria, unlike the placebo. An argument was made that the re-odoration was important to the overall activity of the product only for about 30 min after treatment and, at post-treatment times of 60-180 min, the anti-odor activity of the product was due to its anti-microbial action.…”
Section: Essential Oilssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…10 Substrates for volatile sulfide compounds production are sulfur-containing amino-acids such as cysteine, cystine and methionine present in saliva or gingival fluid. 11 Several microorganisms recovered from periodontal lesions of gingivitis and Braz Oral Res 2008;22(Spec Iss 1): [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] periodontitis are related to produce large amounts of these volatile sulfur compounds. 10 The bacterial interactions are most likely to occur in the gingival crevices and periodontal pockets, but oral malodor can also arise from the posterior dorsal tongue.…”
Section: Halitosis and The Presence Of Oral Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been found only relatively effective against oral malodour (25% reduction vs. 10% for placebo). 77 Shinada K et al showed that a mouthwash containing ClO 2 improved morning bad breath and reduced the concentrations of H 2 S, CH 3 SH and (CH 3 ) in healthy subjects. Moreover ClO 2 mouthwash used over a 7-day period was effective in reducing.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commercially available mouthrinses only mask odors and have only a temporary reducing effect on the total number of microorganisms in the oral cavity. Even when these mouthrinses do contain antiseptic substances, the effects are usually not long-lasting [54,55].…”
Section: Treatment Of Oral Malodormentioning
confidence: 99%