2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2020.113909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of antibodies purification by protein A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar observation has been made with other IgG studies in our group . Nevertheless, even if we only focuse on the recovered antibody mass, the huge amount of hIgG still exceeds the state of the art of reported capacities onto functionalized nanoparticles, which range between 100 and 150 mg g –1 as well as reported data for microparticles, with binding capacities in the range of 30–100 mg g –1 . , This result confirms the basic idea of immobilized ligands on BION as a high promising adsorbent for antibody purification.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar observation has been made with other IgG studies in our group . Nevertheless, even if we only focuse on the recovered antibody mass, the huge amount of hIgG still exceeds the state of the art of reported capacities onto functionalized nanoparticles, which range between 100 and 150 mg g –1 as well as reported data for microparticles, with binding capacities in the range of 30–100 mg g –1 . , This result confirms the basic idea of immobilized ligands on BION as a high promising adsorbent for antibody purification.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…They are widely commercially available even though they are usually offered for small scales. Their IgG binding capacities are in the range of 30–100 mg g –1 or 10–260 μg mL –1 slurry, respectively. However, also magnetic particles of nanometer sizes can be used for protein separation: First studies indicate that the application of nano-sized magnetic particles for HGMS promises high product yields . Their small size in the nanometer range (8–15 nm) results in a large specific surface area of ∼90 m 2 g –1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of artificial and pseudo-biospecific ligands on chromatography matrices have been developed to confer specificity and selectivity toward antibodies, thereby leading to the binding of antibodies to the matrix surfaces. Examples of this type of chromatography are affinity chromatography using artificial protein A or protein A mimetic ligands, thiophilic chromatography, immobilized metal affinity chromatography (referred to as IMAC, MCIC, or MCAC), , hydrophobic charge-induction chromatography (HCIC), and cation-exchange chromatography using phosphate-immobilized zirconia. The artificial ligands on the chromatography matrices are generally stable and cost-efficient but are less specific and less selective for antibodies than protein A . Accordingly, realization of high-purity purification using these artificial ligands as promising alternatives is a critical step for more widespread use of antibodies .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15−18 The artificial ligands on the chromatography matrices are generally stable and cost-efficient but are less specific and less selective for antibodies than protein A. 19 Accordingly, realization of high-purity purification using these artificial ligands as promising alternatives is a critical step for more widespread use of antibodies. 20 A promising strategy for this is to control the binding modes and binding capacities of antibodies by designing a mobile phase on the basis of a binding mechanism that remains unclear.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also bind to immune complexes and immunoglobulins in blood and serum, which has been widely used in biotechnology. Immobilized SpA on polymeric supports can be used as affinity chromatography resins for immunoprecipitation (IP) of antibodies from biological solutions [ 11 , 18 , 29 , 30 , 39 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%