2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of Cr(VI) removal by magnetic greigite/biochar composites

Abstract: s Magnetic greigite/biochar composites (MGBs) were synthesized by a solvothermal method. Cr(VI) was efficiently adsorbed and reduced on MGBs. Cr(VI) removal efficiency depended on the Fe 3 S 4 amounts loaded on MGBs. Fe(II) dissolved from MGBs played a crucial role in Cr(VI) removal. Carbon-centered PFRs on MGBs promoted the surface Fe(III)/Fe(II) cycle.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
8
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the surface area decreased from 25.56 m 2 /g in CMB to 5.44 m 2 /g in M-CMB, which could be attributed to the synthesis of magnetic biochar, causing many micropores were covered by the ash of M-CMB. Similar phenomenon was obtained in the previous work of some researchers reporting the reduction in the surface area after magnetization, because the Fe-containing particles reduced the surface area by filling micropores [6,10,27].…”
Section: Biochar Propertiessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the surface area decreased from 25.56 m 2 /g in CMB to 5.44 m 2 /g in M-CMB, which could be attributed to the synthesis of magnetic biochar, causing many micropores were covered by the ash of M-CMB. Similar phenomenon was obtained in the previous work of some researchers reporting the reduction in the surface area after magnetization, because the Fe-containing particles reduced the surface area by filling micropores [6,10,27].…”
Section: Biochar Propertiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Among these precipitates, such as CdCO 3 , Cd 3 (PO 4 ) 2 , CdSiO 3 , Cd(OH) 2 and CdS, were probably due to high concentrations of CO 3 2− , PO 4 3− , S and Si content in the original biochars ( Figure 1 and Table 1), which were also observed in the previous studies on the heavy metal adsorption by the biochars [1,49,50]. In particular, the precipitates of CdFe 2 O 4 were detected on the surface of M-CMB after adsorption, which could be attributed to the presence of Fe 3 O 4 particles, generating adsorption sites for metal ions [6,10]. Generally, the intensities of XRD peak were strong in both biochars, suggesting the precipitation played an important role in total adsorption.…”
Section: Metal Precipitationsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Cr(VI) ions were first adsorbed on MGBs surface and subsequently reduced to Cr(III). The enhancement of Cr(VI) removal was attributed to efficient surface Fe(III)/Fe(II) cycling via electron transfer with persistent free radicals of biochar, and the Cr(VI) removal efficiency was strongly dependent on the amount of Fe 3 S 4 loaded on MGBs (Wang et al 2020a). The biochar-supported nanoscale iron sulfide (FeS) composites combined carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) (CMC-FeS@biochar) with the mass ratio of FeS:CMC:Biochar = 1:1:1 exhibited Cr(VI) sorption capacity of 130.5 mg/g at pH 5.5 comparing to FeS (38.6 mg/g) and biochar (25.4 mg/g).…”
Section: Sorption Of Heavy Metal Ions and Radionuclidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these suffer from the shortcomings such as tendencies for oxidation and aggregation, limited adsorption capacity, low selectivity, and high cost [ 7 ]. Thus, the further development of highly efficient, abundant, and magnetically separable adsorbent materials has attracted much attention [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%