1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)91050-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of Damage to the Contralateral Testis in Rats With an Ischaemic Testis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this level was lower than that of all other transected groups. This finding is in agreement with Harrison et al [9], whose studies demonstrated a significant rise in antibody levels in littermate rats with simple palpation of the testis. These findings also demonstrate the sensitivity of this animal model to antisperm antibody production and the reason for its use in such studies [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, this level was lower than that of all other transected groups. This finding is in agreement with Harrison et al [9], whose studies demonstrated a significant rise in antibody levels in littermate rats with simple palpation of the testis. These findings also demonstrate the sensitivity of this animal model to antisperm antibody production and the reason for its use in such studies [2].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Several studies have reported impairment of the contralateral testis. [20][21][22] The rationale behind the damage in contralateral testis was explained by autoimmunization against spermatogonium, a process caused by …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These and other authors [3] believe that this phenomenon appears to be immunologically mediated as evidenced by the fact that such alterations are avoidable by removal of the antigenic stimulus (orchiectomy) or by immunosuppression with antilymphocyte globulin and splenectomy. Other authors have not observed this contralateral testicular suppression [ 1, 91.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%