1989
DOI: 10.1042/bj2620581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of DNA strand nicking at apurinic/apyrimidinic sites by Escherichia coli [formamidopyrimidine]DNA glycosylase

Abstract: Escherichia coli [formamidopyrimidine]DNA glycosylase catalyses the nicking of both the phosphodiester bonds 3' and 5' of apurinic or apyrimidinic sites in DNA so that the base-free deoxyribose is replaced by a gap limited by 3'-phosphate and 5'-phosphate ends. The two nickings are not the results of hydrolytic processes; the [formamidopyrimidine]DNA glycosylase rather catalyses a beta-elimination reaction that is immediately followed by a delta-elimination. The enzyme is without action on a 3'-terminal base-f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high G+C content (~65 mol%) of the genomes of mycobacteria puts them at a greater risk of cytosine deamination (to uracil), and oxidative damage of guanosine (to 8-oxoG). The pathways that repair uracil and 8-oxoG are initiated by uracil DNA glycosylase (Ung or UDG; Lindahl, 1979;Duncan, 1981;Krokan et al, 1997) and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg or MutM, Bailly et al, 1989;Tchou et al, 1991;Graves et al, 1992), respectively, which are also two important BER enzymes in mycobacteria (Venkatesh et al, 2003;Jain et al, 2007). On the other hand, UvrB is a central player in NER (Skorvaga et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high G+C content (~65 mol%) of the genomes of mycobacteria puts them at a greater risk of cytosine deamination (to uracil), and oxidative damage of guanosine (to 8-oxoG). The pathways that repair uracil and 8-oxoG are initiated by uracil DNA glycosylase (Ung or UDG; Lindahl, 1979;Duncan, 1981;Krokan et al, 1997) and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg or MutM, Bailly et al, 1989;Tchou et al, 1991;Graves et al, 1992), respectively, which are also two important BER enzymes in mycobacteria (Venkatesh et al, 2003;Jain et al, 2007). On the other hand, UvrB is a central player in NER (Skorvaga et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5Ј-end group generated by endonucleases III and VIII was a terminal phosphate, whereas the 5Ј-end group generated by endonuclease IV was a deoxyribose. The single nucleotide gap with a 3Ј-hydroxyl and a 5Ј-phosphate was made by incubating the AP site-containing transcription template with endonuclease IV followed by formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg) (laboratory stock) (43).…”
Section: Introduction Of Unique Damages To Transcriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalysis by both E. coli Nei (EcoNei) and Fpg (EcoFpg) is by means of the N-terminal proline, which forms a Schiff base with the oxidized lesion (13)(14)(15). Both EcoNei and EcoFpg are trifunctional enzymes containing glycosylase, ␤,␦ lyase, and 5Ј phosphodiesterase activities (16)(17)(18)(19). Fpg and Nei also share common structural motifs, including helix-two-turns-helix (H2TH) and antiparallel ␤-hairpin zinc finger motifs (6,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%