1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02494626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of interaction of diallylmethylamine and its protonated and quaternary forms with their own radicals in solvent

Abstract: The potential energy profdes of reactions of diallylmethylamine and its protonated and quaternary forms with their own radicals were calculated by the semiempirical MNDO-PM3 method taking into account electrostatic solvation effects in the framework of the selfconsistent reaction field model. The reactions studied simulate chain propagation and chain transfet to monomer in radical polymerization of the above monomers in dilute solutions with different dielectric permittivities of the solvents. The conformation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carbonyl carbon of 6 and 7 appeared at 167.68 and 169.58, respectively [not shown in Figure 2(c,d)]. The absence of any residual alkene proton or carbon signal in the spectra of 5–7 indicated the chain transfer process for the termination reaction involving the macroradical abstracting the labile allylic hydrogen of the monomer 45–47. The absence of the signals for the methyl protons and carbon of OCH 2 CH 3 at ∼δ1.4 [Figure 1(c)] and δ14.5 [Figure 2(c)], respectively, ascertained the complete hydrolysis of the ester functionality in 5 giving 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbonyl carbon of 6 and 7 appeared at 167.68 and 169.58, respectively [not shown in Figure 2(c,d)]. The absence of any residual alkene proton or carbon signal in the spectra of 5–7 indicated the chain transfer process for the termination reaction involving the macroradical abstracting the labile allylic hydrogen of the monomer 45–47. The absence of the signals for the methyl protons and carbon of OCH 2 CH 3 at ∼δ1.4 [Figure 1(c)] and δ14.5 [Figure 2(c)], respectively, ascertained the complete hydrolysis of the ester functionality in 5 giving 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and , respectively. The absence of any residual alkene proton or carbon signal in the spectra indicated the chain transfer process for the termination reaction involving the macroradical abstracting the labile allylic hydrogen of monomer 7 . Note that the NMR signals of PSB 16 are shifted downfield than that of APE 17 as a result of the former having the presence of electron‐withdrawing positive nitrogens (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[24], the free electrostatic solvation energies of cationogenic monomers and radicals are well reproduced by the computational method used.…”
Section: Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Obviously, this introduces no considerable error when comparing the energetics of the chain propagation and chain trans-fer reactions for the same reaction system because the initial reagents remain the same, the structures of the TS are almost identical, and the volumes of the cavities for the transition states of chain propagation and chain transfer, according to our calculations, are equal for each of the systems I-III. It was shown [24] that elimination of the ⌬G V terms introduces the maximum error no more than 0.2 kcal/ mol when comparing the E 0,S values for the reactions occurring in different systems (relative energetics): systems I and III or systems II and III (the volumes of the cavities occupied by the reagents and the TS in systems I and II are virtually equal). It was shown also [24] that the error of the determination of the E 0,S absolute value (which is expressed by the ⌬G V Ϫ ¥ ⌬G V r term, where ⌬G V is the free nonelectrostatic solvation energy of the TS and ¥ ⌬G V r is the sum of the contributions of the free nonelectrostatic solvation energies of the reagents) will be no more than 1 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation